Another A***ole with Power.
You got that right about Canada - Truly I say onto thee, America is the last hope - if we let her go down the tubes, that’s it. There is nowhere to go. Freedom - Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness - is being squandered before my very eyes.
She may be right, in the endl and G-d bless her for her work.
But under the secular law, as it exists, the “women’s clinics” are entitled to THEIR “freedom of association”, and they can control who can and cannot responsibly enter their establishment.
She may be morally right, but the “women’s clinics” DO have the secular law behind them and she must take her punishment for doing what she wants to do. G-d bles her.
America is the land of the free for those allowed to be born, so far.
He is pretty clearly saying that his "god" believes in murdering babies. Nice god you have there, judge.
Unless Canada has a "bill of rights" describing abortion as such, it is just another legal activity for now. Dueling was once legal. So was segregation, slavery, and Nazi Germany's treatment of the Jews. Those laws changed and with public outcry this one will too.
Remember, it was a judge who signed the death warrant for Terri Schiavo too. Why do judges hate women?
“She can sit in jail, if that’s the only way to protect people,” he fulminated, calling Wagner “cowardly” for “abusing other human beings” and not having the courage to make her views known through other channels. “This is an extraordinary waste of resources. Get a grip!”
and
Wagner has been arrested on several occasions for peacefully entering abortion facilities in Toronto, where she presents women in the waiting room with a rose and offers them pro-life counseling.
Roses? Peaceful entry? What a terrorist!
“You’re wrong and your God’s wrong,” he continued. “You have complete contempt … There is a right to (abortion) in this country … You don’t have a right to cause (abortion-seeking women) extra pain and grief the way you do.”
I would expect a judge to know the law a little better than this. There is no "right to abortion." There is a right to "security of person," which is the supposed legal basis upon which the laws against abortion were struck down in R. v. Morgentaler in 1988.
However, the lack of a law against it is not equal to a positive right—especially when you consider that Bertha Wilson, incidentally the one woman on the Supreme Court at the time, wrote in her opinion that drafting restrictions on abortion were a "perfectly valid legislative objective" and that the state's interest in protecting the life of the fetus increased as gestation continued.
In other words, no "right" is granted if the same court that supposedly granted it stated that the state had a valid interest in restricting it again. Abortion is not a "right," it is simply not illegal, thanks to a quarter-century of moral cowardice on the part of the national government.
ooooooohhhhh, the judge is gonna be in trouble....
Just wait till Father / God gets home. :0