Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AtlasStalled
The lawyer for Edwards is off-base in accusing the website DNAinfo of defamation and demanding retraction.

This is what leftists do. It doesn't matter that the website is simply reporting what was said to authorities, and it doesn't matter whether the information is true or false. All that matters is defending their guy, because he's one of Them. (For "leftists" above, you could substitute "lawyers" with the same result ;-).

If I'm surprised at anything, it's that John Edwards still gets any support even from leftists. He's such a loser, such an embarassment ... and he's white.

9 posted on 03/22/2012 9:39:14 AM PDT by Tax-chick (I should be, but I'm not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick

Some people are considered under the law as “defamation proof”; in other words, they have such bad reputations nothing you can say or write about them can injure them. I wonder whether Edwards could be considered “defamation proof” since he is both a lawyer and a politician neither of which are held in high regard by the public as a general matter.


21 posted on 03/22/2012 9:59:16 AM PDT by AtlasStalled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson