Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Feeney, get yer book out.

Set down the name, the one Scott Rasmaussen.

Feeney, have you written the name I gave you?

Well, strike a line through it.

That's for him. Scott Rasmaussen.

****************

Newt's calling the shots- and that's how it should be.

I'm in, until Newt's out.

1 posted on 03/19/2012 10:39:22 PM PDT by VinL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: VinL

Party? There is an actual functioning Party?


2 posted on 03/19/2012 10:43:27 PM PDT by Fred (http://whenmittromneycametotown.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL
>> “I think if [Gingrich] dropped out, it would be good for the party and it would be good for Santorum and Romney,” Rasmussen said

Intwisting... vewy, vewy intwisting...

Go Newt!!!

3 posted on 03/19/2012 10:46:30 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL

A bit too late, don’t you think so after the damage has been done? Heck, some of us here on FR have been demanding that Gingrich withdraw ever since Santorum clinched the trifecta! Welcome to reality Mr. Rasmussen but why so late?


5 posted on 03/19/2012 10:48:57 PM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL

What I heard Rasmussen say is “if Newt would get out my boy Romney could roll Santorum”.


6 posted on 03/19/2012 10:50:31 PM PDT by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL
"Rasmussen: ‘It would be good for the party’ if Gingrich dropped out "

That's BS- : ‘It would be good for Slick Willard’ if Gingrich dropped out.

8 posted on 03/19/2012 10:54:36 PM PDT by matthew fuller (A patriotic American would be ASHAMED to have 5 non-veteran adult sons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL
Rasmussen: ‘It would be good for the party’ if Gingrich dropped out

Not if we want a brokered convention, and that is what I am hoping for. Let the people as a whole select our candidate.

9 posted on 03/19/2012 10:55:24 PM PDT by doc1019 (Romney will never get my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL
Victor Andrew de Bier Everleigh McLaglen in The Quiet Man.

Right?


10 posted on 03/19/2012 11:01:41 PM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL

Go Newt!!! Give ‘em hell.


11 posted on 03/19/2012 11:09:25 PM PDT by lwoodham (I am Andrew Breitbart. Don't doubt me on this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL

Newt out.... Zerodamus wins..
If only for entertainment purposes NEWT MUST STAY IN.....

Newt out.. then Zero wins a very boring win over Willard and Santo..

Willard and Santo cannot handle or compete with a billion dollar Zerodamus slush fund and at least 3 or 4 networks and a passel of cable channels carrying water for Barry Half-White.. not to speak of most all newspapers and mags.. and a few Hollywood propaganda movies.. plus all the money and resources of almost every Union..

Newt can.. He can handle it.. Newts a whore but he isn’t a Union Stooge like Santo and Willard.. Like Juan Mclaim I feel Santo and Willard will throw the election..

You know.. like Juan... TAKE A DIVE.. He did you know?..


13 posted on 03/19/2012 11:13:45 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL
Dear Scott,

Go crunch some numbers. Go Newt. Brokered convention.

McGruff

14 posted on 03/19/2012 11:17:35 PM PDT by McGruff (Newt Gingrich, the closest thing we've got to Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL
“Rasmussen suggested that if anything, it is “conceivable” that GOP front-runner Mitt Romney could go to an open convention with with less than 50 percent of the delegates but a big lead, meaning he would be the nominee no matter what”

It's interesting how the GOPe’s narrative is changing as it is looking more and more likely Romney wont have the delegates to clinch the nomination before the convention.

Now they are saying he's going to win anyway even without the delegates..all righty then that takes care of that..NOT

Its been my opinion all along that if Romney cant clinch the nomination before the convention he is toast at the convention.

Even the thick headed GOPe would be forced to nominate a conservative if they would have any chance of winning the election and thus keep their jobs.

15 posted on 03/19/2012 11:18:33 PM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL
Dear Scot.
You are the same guy who said if McCain picked Palin it would be a big mistake. Everyone knows Palin is the only reason McCain did as well as he did.

Newt is not leaving, so your guy can have this, we don't want a liberal
Yours truly.

16 posted on 03/19/2012 11:27:19 PM PDT by Christie at the beach (I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL
Rasmussen suggested that if anything, it is “conceivable” that GOP front-runner Mitt Romney could go to an open convention with with less than 50 percent of the delegates but a big lead, meaning he would be the nominee no matter what.

Fine by me.

Let the blue bloods and country clubbers and their creepy pulled back wives go on record putting the man from KOLOB in the drivers seat of the GOP and let the party die screaming like it deserves to.

17 posted on 03/19/2012 11:27:32 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Rick Santorum voted against Right toWork)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL

Good for the party but bad for the country. Are we going to put party over country?

Well, yes, the GOP Establishment would.

I won’t.


18 posted on 03/19/2012 11:27:32 PM PDT by upsdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL

Please! Does anyone here really think any of the candidates dropping out will change things? We have NO Conservatives running but we do have a lot of Establishment politicians that you can vote for. Yeehah..!

When you have nothing to gain but expelling the worst President of this Century, how do you respond? Do we have to vote for whomever is the current leader of the (Establishment) Republican Party? Yes, time to again vote for the lesser of two evils!.

Can we ever again vote for someone that we actually want for President? Not likely in my lifetime anyway. Sure hope that a NEW Party arises.. Yes, anything is better than what we currently have!


19 posted on 03/19/2012 11:28:21 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL

IMHO santorim is the disruptor.


20 posted on 03/19/2012 11:29:28 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL
‘It would be good for the party’ if Gingrich dropped out

I don't give a flip about the GOP E party, I care about OUR COUNTRY!

And NEWT is the candidate WeThePeople/OUR COUNTRY.

29 posted on 03/20/2012 12:08:59 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL

I’m in til Newt’s out. FUMR TO INFINITY


30 posted on 03/20/2012 12:12:23 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL
Rasmussen: ‘It would be good for the party’ if Gingrich dropped out

It would be GOOD for POLLS if Rasmussen dropped out!

31 posted on 03/20/2012 12:20:22 AM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VinL

“I think if [Gingrich] dropped out, it would be good for the party and it would be good for Santorum and Romney,” Rasmussen said.”


All the more reason for Newt to stay in. Neither of those fruitcakes deserve the presidency and they sure as hell will not get my vote.

I look forward to the complete destruction of the GOP-e.

** President Newt Gingrich-”Our beloved republic deserves nothing less.”


33 posted on 03/20/2012 12:23:15 AM PDT by Gator113 (** President Newt Gingrich-"Our beloved republic deserves nothing less." ~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson