Those 'Reagan Democrats' that the Republicans have ALWAYS needed to win will not vote for Romney. We might have had a fighting chance with Newt, but he wouldn't be pliable to the monied-interests aims and claims as Romney appears to be.
God save these United states!
1 posted on
03/17/2012 9:27:13 AM PDT by
brityank
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: South Hawthorne; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Mo1; Ciexyz; ..
Thank you, Brit
Mitt is not inevitable ping
45 posted on
03/17/2012 12:12:28 PM PDT by
Tribune7
(GAS WAS $1.85 per gallon on the day Obama was Inaugurated! - - freeper Gaffer)
To: brityank
Obama is not running against Romney. Obama needs to beat his record on the economy, not Romney. This is why Obama is going to lose. He can’t win against the deepening economic depression. Obama is toast.
To: brityank
All Conservative and liberty loving forums and their fellow admirers should call for a Code of arms to ask all conservatives of all fractions to Help Newt Gingrich so we can have a real Chance for a Fight against the radicals. I am soooooo tired of going along with the party pushing their candidate on us. Can we get a rebellion going as in to joining our forces towards Newt or we are going to get more corruption and loss of our freedoms. It is time Now to be patriots for Newt/ for America. We have to do something.
49 posted on
03/17/2012 3:04:00 PM PDT by
Christie at the beach
(I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
To: brityank
Romney is about as electable as Ford, dole, or McCain.
The big GOP wins of recent years — 1980, 1994, and 2010 — were achieved by running as conservatives. That’s what the party needs to do.
58 posted on
03/17/2012 9:37:40 PM PDT by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson