>>Like he supported Title 10 and Title 20<<
I’m a Newt supporter, but I’m also a Catholic.
Santorum has fought to defund the Title 10, Title 20 funding of Planned Parenthood. There is actual “women’s health” in those two titles that, as a Conservative orthodox Catholic I have NO problem with.
Please stop smearing our future VP (God willing). He has been strongly prolife with euthanasia, abortion, ESCs AND contraception. It’s Cafeteria not to look at his WHOLE record.
bashed... To bring up truth.. because it’s his own voting record and he said he voted for both at one of the debates. He goes to whichever voting aisle that helps him. Go read his record, I did. Like he voted for funding of Am-track then said he was against it. He was in support of No Child Behind before he was against it. He is was for Title 10, then help set up Title 20 ( to cover his political career butt) Duh. A regular flip flopper, opportunist, from the Bush wing/big government/a team player/a politician.
“Please stop smearing our future VP (God willing).”
Future VP? Are you kidding me? On Romney’s ticket?
I guess there is a divide in the non-Romney vote that is evident in this statement. Many of us just don’t find Romney acceptable at all, no matter who the VP is. The last thing I’m worried about is getting either Newt or Rick on the ticket with Mitt because:
a. Mitt’s never gonna pick either of them anyway, and
b. Even if he did, it would not make me any more enthusiastic about Mitt-the guy is a liberal from Mass with zero evidence of any conservative accomplishments in his background.
I don’t want Rick on the ticket with Mitt, I WANT TO DERAIL MITT!!! And I think there’s still time, and I think Rick is our best shot of doing it.