I’m not being a twit. I’m making a point.
So far, ONE case of a liberal apologizing has been cited, and it involved a completely false accusation.
Rush’s accusation - that she wants, and says she NEEDS, $1000/year for birth control is part of her public testimony. If someone NEEDS sex 1,000+ times a year, what are they?
Someone posted a link to the transcript of her testimony.
I’m going back to read *exactly* what she said.
Then, I’ll answer.
I went back and read the testimony.
About all you can infer from it is:
1) She’s a law student.
2) Some female law students can spend as much as $3000/3 years for birth control
3) Some women need the birth control to treat maladies (sp?) such as endometriosis, etc.
4) She had a good friend that had a cyst on her ovary b/c her birth control was not covered ($100/month) and her ovary had to be removed and she may go into early menopause and not be able to give her mother the grandkids she desires and that it is Georgetown’s fault that this is so.
So....
Is Sandra Fluke a “slut”? Maybe, maybe not. No clear linkage can be drawn either way. An indirect link can be drawn as I have indicated above.
Is Sandra Fluke dishonest? I’d say so. Trying to induce collective guilt for her friend with the ovarian cyst certainly indicates that to me.
Your contention that Rush’s accusation - “that she wants, and says she NEEDS, $1000/year for birth control” was NOT part of her testimony.
The object lesson here is to hang people on the words they actually said, not what someone else says they say.
Re: your statement that “If someone NEEDS sex 1,000+ times a year, what are they?” presumes $1.00/birth control/horizontal bop which I think remains to be shown. ‘Pod.
You don’t take birth control pills every time you have sex, but rather they are taken everyday.