[savagesusie]

Biological relationships are the safest for children—because of the genetic interest, there should be “love” developing and a concern for the children’s future. We are doing the Marxist thing—destroying the Natural Family so we destroy the children. Most abused children are from fatherless families with boyfriends of the mothers the abusers. Prisons are filled with fatherless boys.

Lenin created the “no-fault” divorce and destroyed the family in Russia—so that there is no trust, no loyalty to other humans-—just to the state. With no loving parents children will be emotional cripples and useful idiots. There will be no Lincolns and Washington’s among the abused children. These children are damaged and incapable of normal behavior.

[papertyger]

Biological relationships are the safest for children—because of the genetic interest, there should be “love” developing and a concern for the children’s future.

Nonsense. Prisons are full of men who know exactly who their fathers are...they just didn't have anything to do with them.

The safest relationships are those of people who model classic western philosophical and religious values.

[liberalh8ter]

I grew up in a non-biological family. My adopted Mom and Dad were the most wonderful parents God could have blessed me with. Neither of them ever laid a hand on me and in fact, I was probably showered with more affection and attention than most of my friends who were the biological offspring of their parents.

That being said, the church and religion played a BIG part in my life. I would venture to say that the absence of God and religion are what's really ailing our society.