Skip to comments.
Pelosi's Cartoonish Comments on Gas Prices
Townhall.com ^
| February 26, 2012
| Chris Edwards
Posted on 02/26/2012 5:17:15 AM PST by Kaslin
The congresswomens comments are so cartoonish, I dont even have to comment on them. But I thought Cato readers would like to know what the minority leader of the U.S. House is saying about rising gas prices. From a Nancy Pelosi press release today:
Independent reports confirm that speculators are driving up the cost of oil, hurting consumers and potentially damaging the economic recovery. Wall Street profiteering, not oil shortages, is the cause of the price spike.
We need to take strong action to protect consumers from this speculation. Unfortunately, Republicans have chosen to protect the interests of Wall Street speculators and oil companies instead of the interests of working Americans by obstructing the agencies with the responsibility of enforcing consumer protection laws.
We call on the Republican leadership to act on behalf of American consumers and join our efforts to crack down on speculators who care more about their profits than the price at the pump even if these spikes harm the American consumer and our economy.
For a rational discussion on energy policy, see Downsizing the Department of Energy.
Department of Energy
The Department of Energy oversees nuclear weapons sites and subsidizes conventional and alternative fuels. The department has a history of fiscal and environmental mismanagement. Further, misguided energy regulations have caused large loses to consumers and the economy over the decades.
The department will spend about $45 billion in 2011, or about $380 for every U.S. household. It employs about 17,000 workers directly and oversees 100,000 contract workers at 21 national laboratories and other facilities across the nation. The department operates 37 different subsidy programs.
Timeline of Government Growth
- See this timeline for key events in the departments growth.
Reading Room
Cato Experts
Spending Cuts Summary
Downsize This!
- Energy Subsidies. The department has spent billions of dollars over the decades on dead-end schemes and dubious projects that have often had large cost overruns.
- A Brief History of Energy Regulations. Most federal intrusions into energy markets have been serious mistakes. They have destabilized markets, reduced domestic output, and decreased consumer welfare.
- Energy Intervention Today. The current arguments for energy intervention and energy subsidies fall short.
"All Americans are involved in making energy policy. When individual choices are made with a maximum of personal understanding and a minimum of government restraints, the result is the most appropriate energy policy."
- Reagan administration energy plan, 1981
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
To: autumnraine
I don't know where you are coming from. The US has net imports of 9 million b/d.
Are you suggesting that the oil companies are exporting oil that should go to domestic consumption thereby driving up the price?
41
posted on
02/26/2012 2:20:15 PM PST
by
Former Proud Canadian
(Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
To: Kaslin
Pelosi is a complete idiot as is anyone from that G-d forsaken city who supports here. Still waiting for that earthquake...
To: Former Proud Canadian
I am suggesting that the oil is on federal lands, OUR lands.
This is the equivalent of someone buying water rights on your personal property, while you are thirsting to death and they are selling it to the highest bidder while you are struggling to buy it somewhere else.
At some point wouldn’t you penalize them for not giving you at least first opportunity to purchase or suffer a penalty for selling to someone other than yourself.
I am NOT saying the government should own the oil, I am not saying the government should TELL the oil companies what to do with their oil. I am saying there is nothing wrong with an export tax.
43
posted on
02/26/2012 4:41:04 PM PST
by
autumnraine
(America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
To: autumnraine
Ok, so you want to tax crude oil exported from the US. Does this include products? Gasoline? Propane? Bunker oil? Diesel? Natural gas? Coal?
At what rate would you set the tax?
What is the purpose of taxing these exports?
Can you foresee any bad side effects?
44
posted on
02/26/2012 4:50:53 PM PST
by
Former Proud Canadian
(Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
To: Kaslin
Warren Buffett lost one billion dollars in 2008 speculating on oil. CNN anchors were saying $200-400 barrel prices were coming.
Barack is quite content with $5 a gallon gas.
45
posted on
02/26/2012 6:48:57 PM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(If Obama brings troops home from Japan and Germany he can claim he won WWII finally as well as Iraq.)
To: From The Deer Stand
Nancy Pelosi
“Speculators”....She is Lying.
Remember..”You Have to Pass the Bill before We get to see whats in it”....She should have been Imprisoned just for that Lie.
Then there is the absurd...”Unemployment checks are Stimulating the Economy”...Only a Moron Democrat would swallow that Crap.
and also Her comment that She didn’t know about the WaterBoarding....another Lie to the American People.
She must be distracted getting her Family and Friends
rich off the Treasure Island Ripoff.
and dont forget Her Resturants and Winery dont allow Unions.....
46
posted on
02/26/2012 9:17:08 PM PST
by
LtKerst
(Lt Kerst)
To: Kaslin
Her comments may be cartoonish, but they will be accepted by many in the electorate and she may very well be speaker once again.
IMHO
47
posted on
02/27/2012 4:39:51 AM PST
by
ripley
To: AD from SpringBay
You are precisely correct.
They are not stupid. They work (in well-organized unison) to scare us into letting them "solve" all problems (real or falsified) by confiscating freedom and property, and installing themselves as the benevolent protectors against the free-market boogiepersons.
.
48
posted on
02/27/2012 10:42:54 AM PST
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson