[SunkenCiv]

Thanks Innovative.

[Innovative]

And you’ve got to love this — or just shake your head in disbelief...

Should Global-Warming Activists Lie to Defend Their Cause?

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/2012/02/24/should-global-warming-activists-lie-to-defend-their-cause/

Kant said that when judging the morality of an act, we must weigh the intentions of the actor. Was he acting selfishly, to benefit himself, or selflessly, to help others? By this criterion, Gleick’s lie was clearly moral, because he was defending a cause that he passionately views as righteous. Gleick, you might say, is a hero comparable to Daniel Ellsberg, the military analyst who in 1971 stole and released documents that revealed that U.S. officials lied to justify the war in Vietnam.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Thanks for the post and the ping....passing it on also.

Want to mention these threads:

Fakegate Illustrates Global Warming Alarmists' Deceit and Desperation

Why the Climate Skeptics Are Winning ( Too many of their opponents are intellectual thugs.)

More grants to Gleick scrubbed from EPA Grants Database

[steelyourfaith]

Thanx for the ping SunkenCiv & Ernest_at_the_Beach !

 

Beam me to Planet Gore !