To: conservaterian
Sarah will be the nominee at the convention and will win in November. I think it would be a huge mistake for the GOP convention to nominate anyone other than Newt, Santorum, Romney, or Ron Paul.
The primary process, flawed as it is, is the time where we put our potential nominees to the test.
Only those who have gone through this process are well-known enough by the electorate to be entrusted with the nomination.
Compared to the four remaining candidates, Sarah is very much unknown and untested. Speeches, friendly interviews, and facebook postings don't count. Debates and the harsh glare of the campaign do.
To: rogue yam
I think it would be a huge mistake for the GOP convention to nominate anyone other than Newt, Santorum, Romney, or Ron Paul. The primary process, flawed as it is, is the time where we put our potential nominees to the test. Only those who have gone through this process are well-known enough by the electorate to be entrusted with the nomination. Compared to the four remaining candidates, Sarah is very much unknown and untested. Speeches, friendly interviews, and facebook postings don't count. Debates and the harsh glare of the campaign do.
Sarah unknown and untested?? You seem to have forgotten the fact that she was the vice-presidential nominee in 2008, haven't you? She is the ONLY reason that McLame did as well as what he did.
83 posted on
02/16/2012 2:11:56 PM PST by
conservaterian
(Sarah/DeMint '12-XXX= Now what? Cain?XX Guess not. I GIVE UP)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson