Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: RoosterRedux
CPAC: The first C stands for Communist.
To: RoosterRedux
Moroni the angel applauds.
To: RoosterRedux
Establishment. Means nothing.
We already knew the establishment was in for Romney.
4 posted on
02/11/2012 3:36:14 PM PST by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
To: RoosterRedux
Straw polls are worth as much as the paper they are written on.
Romney is known for packing in his supporters.
Must mean the new spelling of liberal is Cliberal.
Means nothing like all straw polls.
6 posted on
02/11/2012 3:37:38 PM PST by
svcw
(Only difference between Romney & BH is one thinks he will be god & other one thinks he already is.)
To: RoosterRedux
I think that CPAC has a few problems, not the least of which is that it is libertarians that win more votes year after year...not conversvatives. I like some of the blogs that won TEA Party awards, but more than one is not conservative, just anti-DemocRAT.
7 posted on
02/11/2012 3:38:07 PM PST by
q_an_a
(the more laws the less justice)
To: RoosterRedux
How does this jive with the cool reception he was said to have received?
Ya know what? At this point I think all the numbers might just be coming from somebody’s rear end. The poll numbers, the vote numbers, everything. What would stop somebody from just making this stuff up, like Manuel Zelaya did in Honduras? None of it makes sense.
To: RoosterRedux
9 posted on
02/11/2012 3:39:49 PM PST by
Rudder
(The Main Stream Media is Our Enemy---get used to it.)
To: RoosterRedux
Still, 58% voted against him. We’re still splitting the conservative vote.
To: RoosterRedux
No Surprise - the voters listened intently to the prior-day speeches, and voted for the most conservative. It was an easy choice, given that one candidate in particular was saying severely so.
11 posted on
02/11/2012 3:40:56 PM PST by
C210N
(Dems: "We must tax you so that we can buy your votes")
To: RoosterRedux
How many delegates does CPAC have?
(This is a rhetorical question.)
12 posted on
02/11/2012 3:41:58 PM PST by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(REPEAL WASHINGTON! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
To: RoosterRedux
The headline should be 58% of CPAC said anyone but Romney!!
13 posted on
02/11/2012 3:42:20 PM PST by
omega4179
(Internet ID:FU░&#BO)
From the article;
Romney stressed his conservative record in a speech at CPAC on Friday, describing his tenure in Massachusetts as "severely conservative."
In the CPAC speech, Myth Romney used the word "conservative", 25 times in 26 minutes.
Romney's overusage was as bad as John F#%kin' Kerry reminding people over and over to the point of nauseating them that he was in Vietnam.
16 posted on
02/11/2012 3:44:02 PM PST by
pyx
(Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
To: RoosterRedux
helps...burnish his conservative image.
________________________________
when you need help or have to have help and have to “burnish” an image...
that means you have to convince people to IMAGINE ya got the goods...
My imagination doesnt run on Botox and Grecian Formula...
19 posted on
02/11/2012 3:54:05 PM PST by
Tennessee Nana
(Romney a Massachusetts moderate which is a liberal by Republican standards)
To: RoosterRedux
They must be nuckin' futs!
25 posted on
02/11/2012 4:02:28 PM PST by
lightman
(Adjutorium nostrum (+) in nomine Domini--nevertheless, Vote Santorum!)
To: RoosterRedux
Well, then CPAC must not be conservative. They need to change their moniker.
To: RoosterRedux
this is good news, CPAC hasn’t picked the winner since 2000
lol
Plus Romney has won it many times before along with Paul, which tells you just about everything you need to know about it.
To: RoosterRedux
ANY organization that recognizes, supports and panders to a BOTTOM-FEEDING, Islamic-Jihadist-Terrorists defender/facilitator, SCUMBAG such as Grover Norquist (in spite of the voluminous info re: this TRAITOROUS, snake in the grass) can hardly be considered "Conservative" and a reason I would never attend a CPAC conference.
To: RoosterRedux
Yeah, and NYT is reporting he bussed in a bunch of students to vote for him.
To: RoosterRedux
Looks like their poll fell off the cliff in the 2000s. And they only picked the winner 3 out of 18 times...17% success rate.
Year CPAC Straw Poll Winner
1976 Ronald Reagan[39][40]
1980 Ronald Reagan
1984 Ronald Reagan
1986 Jack Kemp[41][42]
1987 Jack Kemp[43]
1993 Jack Kemp[44]
1995 Phil Gramm[45]
1998 Steve Forbes[46]
1999 Gary Bauer[47]
2000 George W. Bush[48]
2005 Rudy Giuliani[49]
2006 George Allen
2007 Mitt Romney
2008 Mitt Romney
2009 Mitt Romney
2010 Ron Paul
2011 Ron Paul
2012 Mitt Romney
37 posted on
02/11/2012 4:30:42 PM PST by
JediJones
(Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
To: RoosterRedux
38 posted on
02/11/2012 4:30:59 PM PST by
SharpRightTurn
( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson