Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

F-35 may fail to meet key requirements (South Korea)
The Korea Times ^ | 02-07-2012 | Lee Tae-hoon

Posted on 02/07/2012 5:29:18 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

[Exclusive] F-35 may fail to meet key requirements

By Lee Tae-hoon

The United States Air Force (USAF) variant of Lockheed Martin’s F-35 will likely fail to meet two of the Korean Air Force’s key requirements — the ability to carry weapons externally and fly at Mach 1.6 (1,930 kilometers per hour) or faster, an industry insider said Tuesday.

He pointed out that the Korean military has clearly outlined the two key features as compulsory requirements in its request for proposal (RFP) released Jan. 30.

“The maximum speed of the F-35 Lightning II, which is still under development, is Mach 1.6, the bare minimum the Air Force has stated as a mandatory requirement,” the insider familiar with the RFP said.

“The question is whether Lockheed Martin’s F-35 can prove itself to fly at such an ideal speed as advertised when a team of Air Force pilots test fly the aircraft later this year.”

The Air Force is scheduled to carry out testing and evaluations on the F-35 and its two rivals, Boeing’s F-15 Silent Eagle and EADS’s Typhoon, from June through September before announcing its selection in October.

The winner of the FX-III project, the third and final phase of Korea’s advanced fight jet procurement project, will deliver 60 high-end aircraft from 2016 for around 8.29 trillion won ($7.26 billion).

The industry source said the F-35, the only fifth generation stealth aircraft offered on the market, will most likely perform worse than Lockheed Martin has assured when the Air Force checks the U.S. defense giant’s latest multirole, single-engine aircraft.

“What is certain to happen is that the U.S. government will provide assurances to the Air Force that the F-35 will be able to fly at Mach 1.6 by overcoming all of the technical glitches and development problems by the time it is delivered to Korea,” the source said.

“Eventually, this will pave the way for Lockheed Martin, the favorite choice for the U.S. government, to get away with the compulsory requirement and win the FX-III bid. All the broken promises will only cost millions of dollars in penalties.”

Another industry insider pointed out that Lockheed Martin will be unlikely to complete its envisioned development of external pods and pylons for its latest stealth aircraft in time.

“Lockheed Martin has boasted that its aircraft is capable of carrying weapons not only internally, but also externally on its six external missile pylons,” he said. “But it will be physically impossible to complete the development of the external pylons by the time the F-35 is delivered to Korea.”

Randy Howard, Lockheed Martin’s director of the Korea F-35 Campaign, also acknowledged that the external carriage may come as an option for Korea.

“Lockheed Martin did not cancel it, the U.S. government prioritized it,” Howard said, explaining why doubts have been raised over the development of the F-35’s external hard points.

“The F-35 is designed to carry weapons internally. That’s what it does, and that’s why it is stealthy.”

He argued that the F-35’s primary attribute, the ability to penetrate into the enemy’s territory without being detected, will be significantly compromised if Korea chooses to mount weapons externally.

“If you carry weapons externally, you are not stealthy. That’s not normally how you are going to operate F-35s,” he said.

He did note that if Korea insists on the F-35 to have an external carriage, his company is willing to customize it.

“It is only a question of prioritization of weapon certification,” he argued.

“If there are requirements for the external carriage of different weapons, it is not a hard thing because all of the capabilities are there.”

Other industry officials, however, refuted Howard’s claim, saying the development of external pylons not only reduces the aircraft stealth capabilities, but also requires a fundamental change in the aircraft design, which the USAF is not willing to pay for.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; f35; rokaf; southkorea

1 posted on 02/07/2012 5:29:28 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

everyone on this thread should note another F-35 article

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2843399/posts

it is a about Chicom espionage on the F-35


2 posted on 02/07/2012 6:07:29 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The day that SK buys a fighter made anywhere but the US should mark the exit of US troops in SK.


3 posted on 02/07/2012 6:14:43 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Eh ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; Wuli; Eric in the Ozarks

Stealth Fighter with External Weapons is like NASCAR with a loaded luggage rack.

Either the Korean Air Force procurement people are idiots, or the article missed something.


4 posted on 02/07/2012 6:38:07 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

I suspect the fix is in, somewhere...


5 posted on 02/07/2012 6:45:01 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Eh ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Where I come from, this is known as a negotiating tactic.

Nothing more.

Raise the price.


6 posted on 02/07/2012 6:51:43 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (What if Obama isn't the anti-Christ after all? What if it's Romney?...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine; Wuli; Eric in the Ozarks

South Korea had earlier ‘relaxed’ the stealth requirements for this competition by excluding internal carriage and RCS capabilities. My guess is they are angling for lower price and technology considerations from Boeing and Eurofighter-

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2012/01/116_102739.html


7 posted on 02/07/2012 7:11:07 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
Stealth Fighter with External Weapons is like NASCAR with a loaded luggage rack.

There is a time when stealth is not required.

8 posted on 02/07/2012 7:15:32 AM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
There is a time when stealth is not required.

There is a time when F-35's are not required.

9 posted on 02/07/2012 7:41:27 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The F35 has already gone to mach 1.6

External stores are in the pipeline for testing, gotta clear envelope and test points first to make sure you’re not gonna tear a wing off or something.


10 posted on 02/07/2012 7:52:49 AM PST by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political party's in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
“If you carry weapons externally, you are not stealthy. That’s not normally how you are going to operate F-35s,” he said.

BS. The F-35 was designed for first-day-of-war stealth, then subesquent non-stealthy but larger external payloads.


11 posted on 02/07/2012 8:15:17 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson