I just love how they write these articles.
The question is about recusal. They label the group “consrevative” - then talk about the uninsured. WTF do the uninsured have to do with the legal question of recusal? Noting. Zero. Should not even be mentioned - until at least her ROLE IN PROMOTING THE LEGALITY THE IDEA TO THE PRESIDENT is covered. But - story omits the pertinant data, to work in the propaganda angle.
At least they are consistent.
“Oh look what a wonderful law. Isn’t it worth a little cheating?”
Keep it up Lame Streamers. Soon all who listen to you will live in one square block in New York City.