Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Question of Priorities
Townhall.com ^ | January 20, 2012 | Jonah Goldberg

Posted on 01/20/2012 4:25:46 AM PST by Kaslin

"In the Treasury we do not speak of tons of silver. Our unit is the troy ounce."

That was the response from some bureaucrat when Leslie Groves, the man who oversaw the Manhattan Project, sought thousands of tons of silver to be turned into electrical wires.

Groves got his silver. Why? Because completing the Manhattan Project -- and winning the war -- was America's top priority.

For three years, the Obama administration and its cheerleaders have tried to claim that they stand for the same can-do spirit. Administration officials have a rare form of Keynesian Tourette's syndrome whereby they blurt out phrases like "Infrastructure!" ... "Spending multiplier!" ... "Shovel ready!" ... "Nation-building at home!" ... "Investment!" almost as often as they draw breath. Just last week, Obama's own handpicked jobs council -- perhaps looking at the fully employed and booming oil state of North Dakota -- advised that the U.S. must embrace an "all-in approach" to the energy sector, including the pursuit of "policies that facilitate the safe, thoughtful and timely development of pipeline, transmission and distribution projects."

Obama himself has insisted time and again he cares only about "what works" and not about ideological or partisan point scoring. Nary an utterance from the president doesn't include some claim that his "top," "chief," "first" and "number one" priority is to create jobs and get America working again.

Just last week he announced that he wants to streamline government to cut red tape and make both government and the economy more efficient.

It's all a farrago of lies.

Now, maybe they believe all of this stuff, but that doesn't disprove they're lying; it just proves they're lying to themselves, too.

Obama's decision to block the building of the Keystone pipeline on the grounds that the Congress -- in a bipartisan vote -- didn't give the bureaucrats enough time to study the issue is akin to Leslie Groves accepting that he couldn't have his silver because he failed to ask for it in troy ounces.

The State Department simply didn't have the time, Obama the alleged red-tape cutter lamented, to check every box on its mountains of triplicated forms. The eight-volume environmental impact statement cogitates on the possible spreading of "137 federally restricted and regulated noxious weeds," as well as an unspecified number of "state and local noxious weeds." By all means, let's hold up a massive infrastructure project that will cost taxpayers nothing and create bountiful jobs and tax revenues so we can check -- again! -- that local noxious weeds don't gain the upper hand (upper leaf?).

It doesn't help Obama's case that his excuse is a sham. The Keystone pipeline had already been essentially cleared by environmental bureaucrats. Adding the pipeline from Alberta to the Gulf wouldn't scar some pristine wilderness, it would be more like adding just one more string to a spider web, given how many pipelines already crisscross the region.

Opponents say it would threaten the groundwater in Nebraska, where some 21,000 miles of pipeline already exist. But, as the American Enterprise Institute's Kenneth Green notes, any spilled oil would have to flow uphill to reach the Ogallala Aquifer.

Even the unstated but important motives driving opposition to the pipeline are hogwash. The environmentalists to which Obama is pandering have an understandable, if at times irrational, fear of oil spills and a religious faith in the dangers of global warming. The only problem is that blocking the pipeline will, if anything, increase the likelihood of oil spills because Canada will still bring the oil to market. But if it can't sell it to America it will sell it to China, which will bring it home via tankers, which spill more often -- and more calamitously -- than pipelines. Moreover, China will still burn the oil, meaning the effects -- real or alleged -- on global warming will be the same (or marginally worse, given the "footprint" of tankers). Also, the U.S. will still buy oil -- only we'll get more of it from the Middle East, again via tankers, deepening our dependence on their oil (another Obama bugaboo).

Theories abound as to what's going through Obama's mind. He wants to deny the Republicans a policy victory. He needs to build the case that the GOP is playing partisan games. He's an ideologue who, like his environmental base, just doesn't like oil. He honestly believes that the bureaucrats need to do yet another environmental study. He's bigoted against infrastructure projects that don't require government planning and taxpayer dollars (like Solyndra).

All of these explanations are plausible. And all of them highlight that his top, chief, first and number one priorities aren't what he says they are.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: energypolicy; keystonepipeline; marxistcoup; thedestroyers

1 posted on 01/20/2012 4:25:50 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Obama's decision to block the building of the Keystone pipeline on the grounds that the Congress -- in a bipartisan vote -- didn't give the bureaucrats enough time to study the issue...

This from the bunch who have been so enamored with "we can't wait" and "pass this bill now."

Mr. niteowl77

2 posted on 01/20/2012 4:35:05 AM PST by niteowl77 (Mitt Romney: the horse the GOP elite intends to ride into the abyss. Or is it the other way around?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
OK, I'll bite. Not knowing a whit about how atomic bombs are built, why were "thousands of tons of silver needed"?
3 posted on 01/20/2012 4:35:48 AM PST by Graybeard58 (Eccl 10 v. 19 A feast is made for laughter, and wine maketh merry: but money answereth all things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What is on Obama’s mind is the destruction of American economy so that Socialim can take over.

DO NOT EVER listen to what Obama say’s. Watch what he does.

He promised jobs then he does everything he can to destroy jobs.He promised a cut in the debt, the he raised it.

The things he promised the Whacko’s he hasn’t got any problems getting through. DADT, Obamacare,EPA ruining America.

This guy has to go if we expect to save our country.


4 posted on 01/20/2012 4:39:36 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Beautifully penned and thoughtful article from Jonah Goldberg.
0bama will sit on his hands rather than make the call. Worst pres__ent ever.


5 posted on 01/20/2012 5:00:13 AM PST by SueRae (I can see November from my HOUSE!!!!!!!! 11.06.2012, the Tower of Sauron falls,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
OK, I'll bite. Not knowing a whit about how atomic bombs are built, why were "thousands of tons of silver needed"?

Through the magic of Google, a Wikipedia article on the Manhattan Project states the following:

Marshall and Nichols discovered that the electromagnetic isotope separation process would require 5,000 tons of copper, which was in desperately short supply. However, silver could be substituted, in an 11:10 ratio. On 3 August 1942, Nichols met with Under Secretary of the Treasury Daniel W. Bell and asked for the transfer of 6,000 tons of silver bullion from the West Point Depository. "Young man," Bell told him, "you may think of silver in tons but the Treasury will always think of silver in troy ounces!" Eventually, 14,700 tons were used.

6 posted on 01/20/2012 5:15:53 AM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

I can only think for very precise wiring for very precise electical timing. Timing is crucial to the detonation process in an atomic device and this would be before the development of the ubiquitous timing sources, e.g. temperature-controlled crystal oscillators, we have now.


7 posted on 01/20/2012 5:20:26 AM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Just last week he announced that he wants to streamline government to cut red tape and make both government and the economy more efficient.

It's all a farrago of lies.

A good summary of the entire Obama Admin to date!

8 posted on 01/20/2012 5:22:17 AM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson