Skip to comments.
LISTEN: Justice Alito Fired Up in Case Pitting Property Owners Against EPA
ABC ^
| January 17, 2012
| Ariane de Vogue
Posted on 01/17/2012 8:11:13 AM PST by WilliamIII
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: P-Marlowe
Any idea where Alito stands on Kelo?
41
posted on
01/17/2012 1:41:16 PM PST
by
xzins
(Newt Gingrich Cleaned Up In Last Night's Debate! Awesome Performance!)
Boop the Bottle! Don't Annoy the Baby!
All Babies Love Their Bottles
Donate monthly and end FReepathons!
Sponsors will donate $10
For each new monthly sign-up
42
posted on
01/17/2012 2:04:35 PM PST
by
TheOldLady
(FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
To: snowstorm12
did they know it was wetlands when they bought it?
Who said it’s wetlands? The EPA, maybe, but the Sacketts contest that.
To: P-Marlowe
The Great Plains, otherwise known as The Breadbasket of America, is not drained swamps, it is irrigated desert. Much of the Midwest including Ohio is not former swampland but former forest.
California's Imperial Valley, a cornucopia of agricultural plenty, is also an irrigated desert btw.
To: snowstorm12
did they know it was wetlands when they bought it? maybe they should have fully inspect the land they bought and checked it out better before buying. It looks like they bought a money pit. If I remember correctly, their lot is surrounded by other homes which had been there for years, a few houses from the lake. There was a link awhile back to an overhead of the property.
Here's a pic of them on their property. Look like wetlands to you?
Here's another view:
To: PrairieLady2
>>It wouldnt surprise me if the EPA continues to try to schtick the $75K/day fines under the old law, but theyll be forced to remedy their processes which will help others in the future.
But what of the 8th Amendment?
46
posted on
01/17/2012 10:48:32 PM PST
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: WilliamIII
Have had many fights with these people.
They even called "wetland" right where a house had stood for over 100 years alongside a multi acre peach farm. They're nuts!!
To: WilliamIII; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; ...
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESFReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
48
posted on
01/24/2012 8:35:34 PM PST
by
BuckeyeTexan
(Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
To: snowstorm12
did they know it was wetlands when they bought it? maybe they should have fully inspect the land they bought and checked it out better before buying. It looks like they bought a money pit. The Sacketts were in possession of a building permit issued by the local municipality.
But that overlooks the larger question. Why should an agency of the federal government have any authority over property located in -- and administered by -- a small town in Idaho?
49
posted on
01/24/2012 8:55:45 PM PST
by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson