Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BASF to end GM (genetically-modified) crop production for the EU
European Voice ^ | 16.01.2012 | 17:39 CET | Dave Keating

Posted on 01/16/2012 12:09:15 PM PST by Olog-hai

German chemical company BASF today (16 January) announced that it is stopping production of genetically-modified (GM) crops for the European market, citing hostility from consumers as the reason for the decision.

“There is still a lack of acceptance for this technology in many parts of Europe — from the majority of consumers, farmers and politicians,” said Stefan Marcinowski, a member of BASF's board. “It does not make business sense to continue investing in products exclusively for cultivation in this market.”

The company will move its plant-science unit from Limburgerhof in Germany to the United States. It will also close other sites in Germany and Sweden.

BASF said it has already halted work on the Amflora potato, a GM crop licensed by the European Commission in 2010. The potato was later withdrawn from the market after an unapproved GM variety was discovered. BASF's withdrawal from the market leaves Monsanto's MON810 maize as the only remaining GM crop authorized for cultivation in the EU. …

Several GM varieties have been approved for importation into the EU, but only Amflora and MON810 have been approved for cultivation. No GM crop has yet been approved by the EU for human consumption, they are instead being used by industry and as animal feed. GM crops are widely used in other markets, including the United States. …

(Excerpt) Read more at europeanvoice.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agribusiness; bigsocialistag; geneticmodification; goodriddance; govlinked; monopoly

1 posted on 01/16/2012 12:09:23 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Cue the Muppets.......

YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

Another mega production outfit locating some manufacturing to the US. Bet they land in Indiana.


2 posted on 01/16/2012 12:23:32 PM PST by Tenacious 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Liberalism=inefficiencies. Keep using that non-GM stuff and dealing with the problems that motivated people to come up with GM derived solutions.


3 posted on 01/16/2012 12:30:19 PM PST by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The Europeans even have a fear of pollen from GMO crops showing up in honey - what seemingly would be a small matter has even led to trade spats with Brazil and Argentina.

In my experience, Europeans have a very strong luddite and authoritarian strain. Beyond our patrimony of Western Culture, I feel there is very little that the USA should emulate in Europe.


4 posted on 01/16/2012 12:33:54 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Here's a question. Since hybridization is still allowed, and genetic testing and genome analysis is getting cheaper and cheaper, is it considered genetic modification if you hybridize plants in large quantities in the lab and then pick out the seeds which just happen to have the genetic combinations you desire and would have made if you could have genetically engineered them? Sure, you won't get some of the transspecies gene transfers like you could with GM, but you get a lot more targeted hybridization than you would if you had to rely on just picking out the choice hybrids after they grow.
5 posted on 01/16/2012 12:34:45 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Herman Cain: possibly the escapee most dangerous to the Democrats since Frederick Douglass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
To the Euro-peeons, it isn't real food without the spots and worms.
6 posted on 01/16/2012 12:44:13 PM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Some groups are picky. Japanese prefer their own produce, as do S. Koreans. If Europe wants non-GMO and country of origin labeling, that’s on them.


7 posted on 01/16/2012 12:45:44 PM PST by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

I woder if Canola oil is sold in Europe...


8 posted on 01/16/2012 12:51:54 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Theoria
If Europe wants non-GMO and country of origin labeling, that’s on them.

Yes. They certainly can/should choose what they want to eat.

9 posted on 01/16/2012 12:52:45 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

As per your post – yes you could and would have a genetically engineered plant, but the definition of genetically-modified means that you insert a gene that is from another species or a foreign gene to that is not specific to that genome. Hence Roundup Ready corn became GM when a Roundup tolerant gene was found in a certain bacteria, isolated and inserted into the corn DNA. Conventional hybridization has always been done as you describe in the lab, except desired genetic combinations are found by growing the F1 hybrids and selecting the desired traits visually.


10 posted on 01/16/2012 1:04:10 PM PST by slag (reelect nobody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

All I know about BASF is that their blank audio cassettes stunk, but cost as much or more than TDK and Maxell.


11 posted on 01/16/2012 1:09:12 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (May Mitt Romney be the Mo Udall of 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“It’s not nice to fool Mother Nature”


12 posted on 01/16/2012 1:33:33 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Limbaugh: Tim Tebow miracle: "He had atheists praying to God that he would lose.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
German chemical company BASF today (16 January) announced that it is stopping production of genetically-modified (GM) crops for the European market, citing hostility from consumers as the reason for the decision.

Luddites. There is no scientific basis for this "hostility" to GM crops - it's just uninformed superstitious fear. And yet the same folks who mindlessly oppose so-called "Frankenfood" believe themselves qualified to inform the rest of us that "the science is settled" when it comes to global warming.
13 posted on 01/16/2012 1:41:27 PM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Now that is the truth, none of them can explain to me why they do not moo from drinking cows milk.


14 posted on 01/16/2012 2:56:12 PM PST by org.whodat (What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson