Posted on 01/16/2012 11:11:19 AM PST by jazusamo
|
|
With all the talk about "disparities" in innumerable contexts, there is one very important disparity that gets remarkably little attention disparities in the ability to create wealth. People who are preoccupied, or even obsessed, with disparities in income are seldom interested much, or at all, in the disparities in the ability to create wealth, which are often the reasons for the disparities in income. In a market economy, people pay us for benefiting them in some way whether we are sweeping their floors, selling them diamonds or anything in between. Disparities in our ability to create benefits for which others will pay us are huge, and the skills required can develop early or sometimes not at all. A recent national competition among high school students who create their own technological advances turned up an especially high share of such students winning recognition in the San Francisco Bay Area. A closer look showed that the great majority of these Bay Area students had Asian names. Asian Americans are a substantial presence in this region but they are by no means a majority, much less such an overwhelming majority as they are among those winning high tech awards. This pattern of disproportionate representation of particular groups among those with special skills and achievements is not confined to Asian Americans or even to the United States. It is a phenomenon among particular racial, ethnic or other groups in countries around the world the Ibos in Nigeria, the Parsees in India, the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire, Germans in Brazil, Chinese in Malaysia, Lebanese in West Africa, Tamils in Sri Lanka. The list goes on and on. Gross inequalities in skills and achievements have been the rule, not the exception, on every inhabited continent and for centuries on end. Yet our laws and government policies act as if any significant statistical difference between racial or ethnic groups in employment or income can only be a result of their being treated differently by others. Nor is this simply an opinion. Businesses have been sued by the government when the representation of different groups among their employees differs substantially from their proportions in the population at large. But, no matter how the human race is broken down into its components whether by race, sex, geographic region or whatever glaring disparities in achievements have been the rule, not the exception. Anyone who watches professional basketball games knows that the star players are by no means a representative sample of the population at large. The book "Human Accomplishment" by Charles Murray is a huge compendium of the top achievements around the world in the arts and sciences, as well as in sports and other fields. Nowhere have these achievements been random or representative of the demographic proportions of the population of a country or of the world. Nor have they been the same from one century to the next. China was once far more advanced technologically than any country in Europe, but then it fell behind and more recently is gaining ground. Most professional golfers who participate in PGA tournaments have never won a single tournament, but Arnold Palmer, Jack Nicklaus and Tiger Woods have each won dozens of tournaments. Yet these and numerous other disparities in achievement are resolutely ignored by those whose shrill voices denounce disparities in rewards, as if these disparities are somehow suspicious at best and sinister at worst. Higher achieving groups whether classes, races or whatever are often blamed for the failure of other groups to achieve. Politicians and intellectuals, especially, tend to conceive of social questions in terms that allow them to take on the role of being on the side of the angels against the forces of evil. This can be a huge disservice to those individuals and groups who are lagging behind, for it leads them to focus on a sense of grievance and victimhood, rather than on how they can lift themselves up instead of trying to pull other people down. Again, this is a worldwide phenomenon a sad commentary on the down side of the brotherhood of man. |
Bravo. Having wealth means little if one is unwilling or unwitting to leverage that wealth to create more of it (or at least stretch it as long as possible). Education is free for those who want it, and opportunities abound to start businesses for nigh unto nothing - it’s the will to create wealth that is the difference, not the mere possession of it.
As often noted: if we redistributed all the wealth evenly among all people, in a short time it would all shift back to right about where it is now. That’s because some people attract/acquire wealth, while others spend/squander it.
[blogpimp]A lot of people contend those on welfare who spend their free money on chips & other junk food to “maximize calories per dollar” are a prime reason for my tagline.[/blogpimp]
Father Greely, the liberal priest and sociologist.published a work comparing the financial achievements of different religious groups. Apparently, being a member of a particular religious group has a bearing on achievement. Jews were at the top, followed by Irish Catholics, Polish and other ethnics were further down, as were some protestant groups. Sowell has written a book called Black Rednecks. arguing that northern blacks who move north have adopted the anti-intellectualism long associated with southern poor whites. Their religion also does not steep them theological constructs. Hence even Middle-class blacks lack skill in discursive reasoning, an area where Jews excel. Subjectivism reigns in place of reason. Asians, it seems. are not handicapped in this way. Their approach is objective.
I read a study once that indicated that the average income of black Catholics was higher than that of white Catholics (and much higher than that of non-Catholic blacks). This is probably because they are either a self-selected group that has had to make some effort to be Catholic or who have become Catholic as the result of sending their kids to Catholic schools, or were among the small group of born-Catholic African-Americans from Florida, Louisiana and other parts of the South that had had a Spanish or French influence.
...means that many owe a few.
Did you know that some black Catholic school children have calluses on their knuckles?
Seems sassin’ the Penguin results in the time honored ruler across said knuckles. The same callosities have been observed on the knuckles of other racial groups.
Thus we know that Penguins are color blind.
And, we know that some students are sassier than others.
“By their knuckles shall Ye know them”.
;-)
This can be a huge disservice to those individuals and groups who are lagging behind, for it leads them to focus on a sense of grievance and victimhood, rather than on how they can lift themselves up instead of trying to pull other people down.
Amen to that!
When Sowell writes,
“A recent national competition among high school students who create their own technological advances turned up an especially high share of such students winning recognition in the San Francisco Bay Area. A closer look showed that the great majority of these Bay Area students had Asian names.”
which specific competition is he referring to?
I honesty don’t know but here’s a link with an email contact link for Dr. Sowell if you wish to contact him.
http://townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/2012/01/17/an_ignored_disparity
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.