Skip to comments.
Reince Priebus Expects Nominee ‘Pretty Quickly’
politico.com ^
| 12/27/11
| TIM MAK
Posted on 12/27/2011 9:55:00 AM PST by BarnacleCenturion
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: BarnacleCenturion
Priebus dismissed worries that there is currently no clear leader in the GOP contest and said it was nothing for Republicans to worry about.
Everybody remain clam.
2
posted on
12/27/2011 9:58:50 AM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
To: BarnacleCenturion
I agree. Quit listening to the left wing hype. The process we are going through right now is healthy and we will nominate a qualified candidate who will beat Obama decisively in Nov.
3
posted on
12/27/2011 9:59:18 AM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: BarnacleCenturion
I’m completely disenchanted with the whole election process. My state votes in May...enough said. :-(
4
posted on
12/27/2011 9:59:25 AM PST
by
alicewonders
((GO PERRY!))
To: BarnacleCenturion
You have to seriously consider ancestral DNA fracture when parents name their son Reince Priebus. How did this guy ever survive grammar school alive? As to the nominee I’m sure it’s the exact loser the RINO elites have selected for us. If it’s Mittens, I am staying home. But wait for it,...I anticipate a young Conservative VP selection by Mittens ala McLame! What a disaster!
5
posted on
12/27/2011 10:01:19 AM PST
by
Doc Savage
("I've shot people I like a lot more,...for a lot less!" Raylan Givins)
To: Georgia Girl 2
If this process is healthy than I’m calling my doctor! By the way, in this healthy process you describe ANY leftist can register AT the TA caucus that day and vote for any extreme loser they want,. then slink back to the DemonRat Slave Plantation! Same for NH, and almost every other state. Nice worthless process to choose your nominee. Absolute insanity!
6
posted on
12/27/2011 10:04:32 AM PST
by
Doc Savage
("I've shot people I like a lot more,...for a lot less!" Raylan Givins)
To: IowaHawk; BarnacleCenturion
To: BarnacleCenturion; All
....in response to a question, that he thought Newt Gingrich was qualified for the presidency. Of course I think hes fit to be president. Obviously, we have a president in the White House that, before he took office, two years earlier, was a state senator from Illinois. How has that served our country? he said.
Good for him. I get so pissed when people say things like: "Sarah Palin is not qualified to be President". Any Republican who has ever even been thought of as a potential candidate is more qualified than the meat-head we have in there now.
8
posted on
12/27/2011 10:08:18 AM PST
by
no dems
(Why do you never see "Obama" bumper stickers on cars going to work in the morning?)
To: Doc Savage
You have to seriously consider ancestral DNA fracture when parents name their son Reince Priebus. How did this guy ever survive grammar school alive?Exactly. you can tell this puke is a product of arrogant statist elites.
This girly man probably has never had dirt under his fingernails. I loathe the RNC more than the DNC. At least the liberals are honest in their advocacy of elites ruling over us with an iron fist.
9
posted on
12/27/2011 10:10:39 AM PST
by
sand88
To: Responsibility2nd
10
posted on
12/27/2011 10:15:13 AM PST
by
GQuagmire
('Don't Piss The Lady Off'...)
To: Responsibility2nd
11
posted on
12/27/2011 10:15:28 AM PST
by
GQuagmire
('Don't Piss The Lady Off'...)
To: BarnacleCenturion
After hearing a replay radio Hannity program yesterday where Priebus was a guest, it was clear by what he said and did not say that he a Romney enabler. While I agree with him that the negative campaigning between our candidates does NOT give democrats any fodder they could not access on their own, his commentary pointed to Romney by default.
Everywhere seems to be about Romney by default. So, what are we going to do about it? Are we going to coalesce or not?
12
posted on
12/27/2011 10:16:13 AM PST
by
RitaOK
(wRasmussen- the polling standard for accuracy.)
To: BarnacleCenturion
Remember when they were getting rid of Michael Steele and all the potential GOP Party Headquarters apparatchik’s were vying for his job?
Does anyone else remember how they all swooned over the TEA party an dhow we they were all grateful at how the TEA party help in the 2010 elections and how THEY were the real TEA party guy to run the GOP?
Does everyone here remember all that?
Because they sure don't.
13
posted on
12/27/2011 10:16:36 AM PST
by
Mr. K
(Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
To: BarnacleCenturion; All
Quite frankly, I think the third-party candidates will take more votes away from Barack Obama than from our candidates.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I found the above statement, made by the RNC Chairman, to be very intriguing. Does anyone agree with that statement; yes or no? Why?
14
posted on
12/27/2011 10:27:48 AM PST
by
no dems
(Why do you never see "Obama" bumper stickers on cars going to work in the morning?)
To: RegulatorCountry
To: Doc Savage
Well its states rights. Every state makes its own election rules for each party. Its always been that way. The only reason everyone is all wee wee’d up about it this year is because the Democrats are not going through their own primay contortions. All the spotlight is on the Republicans. Once Iowa is over things will progress pretty quickly.
16
posted on
12/27/2011 10:32:46 AM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: alicewonders
Im completely disenchanted with the whole election process. My state votes in May...enough said. :-(Texas is currently scheduled for Super Tuesday, also the 175th anniversary of The Alamo.
17
posted on
12/27/2011 10:35:47 AM PST
by
Night Hides Not
(My dream ticket for 2012 is John Galt & Dagny Taggart!)
To: Mr. K
Does anyone else remember how they all swooned over the TEA party and how we they were all grateful at how the TEA party help in the 2010 elections and how THEY were the real TEA party guy to run the GOP?
Does everyone here remember all that?
Because they sure don't.Memo to RNC: we remember.
You give us flip-floppin' Mitt, and you may just kiss the House bye-bye to boot.
What the yay-hoos at the RNC really forget is that McCain would have lost in Mondalean fashion had Sarah not been on the ticket.
To beat back Obama and his $1 billion war chest, the base will have to respond like it's never been asked to.
If the RNC's game plan is to seek the moderate/independent vote while assuming the base (read Tea Party) will come around, they are sadly mistaken.
18
posted on
12/27/2011 10:43:12 AM PST
by
Night Hides Not
(My dream ticket for 2012 is John Galt & Dagny Taggart!)
To: BarnacleCenturion
The RNC has been shamefully AWOL in drawing attention to all of Bari's scandals as well as other corrupt Democrats!
I rarely see or hear from this guy.
19
posted on
12/27/2011 10:45:16 AM PST
by
TexasCajun
(Fast & Furious , Solyndra & Light Squared would be enough to impeach any White President !!)
To: BarnacleCenturion
The RNC has fixed the primary race for Romney.
20
posted on
12/27/2011 10:47:01 AM PST
by
DFG
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson