Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More mush: Judging the worst journalism of 2011
WORLD ^ | 12/31/11 | Marvin Olasky

Posted on 12/27/2011 4:32:43 AM PST by rhema

It's time once again to relish the worst mainstream journalism of the past 12 months. For the 24th year in a row I'm a judge for the Media Research Center awards, and this year the 98 finalists taught me a lot.

I thought President Barack Obama's popularity was evaporating, but ABC's Christiane Amanpour called him "full of sunny optimism, very Reaganesque," and Lara Spencer on the same network asked, "Is President Obama a baby whisperer? ... Watch as the First Lady tries to quiet down the fussy little friend. ... She then hands the bawling baby to the big man and, presto, the tot is simply transfixed."

I thought Middle Eastern demonstrators want basic human rights and Midwest state workers hope to retain above-average paychecks, but New York Times reporters Michael Cooper and Katharine Seelye equated Wisconsin with Tunisia, ABC's Diane Sawyer saw "Cairo moved to Madison," and ABC's Amanpour saw both efforts as "people power making history. A revolt in the Midwest and a revolution sweeping across the Middle East."

I didn't realize that Tea Party folks were terrorists, but New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman equated them to Hezbollah, and within a week fellow Times columnist Joe Nocera was writing that "Tea Party Republicans have waged jihad on the American people" and wear "suicide vests." MSNBC's Chris Matthews similarly observed that "the GOP has become the Wahhabis of American government."

Matthews didn't stop there. Last month he commented on Republican voters: "They hate. ... Their brains, racked as they are by hatred, they lack the 'like' mode." He could have been describing himself when he complained about talk show hosts who "see the other end of the field as evil, as awful. Not just disagreeable but evil."

At least television pundits, unlike their print equivalents, sometimes have guests who talk back. Matthews fell into a rant when questioning Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele: "You go to a Democratic convention ... and black folk are hanging together and having a good time. ... You go to a Republican event, you get a feeling that you are all told ... 'Don't get together, don't crowd, you'll scare these people.' ... Did you fear that if you got together with some other African-Americans, these white guys might get scared of you?" Steele replied, "No! What are you talking about?"

On the other hand, some guests (and listeners) don't talk back. In February another MSNBC host, Lawrence O'Donnell, was interviewing Michigan ex-Governor Jennifer Granholm. He stated, "The Republican Party is saying that the president of the United States has bosses, that the union bosses this president around. Does that sound to you like they are trying to consciously or subconsciously deliver the racist message that, of course, a black man can't be the real boss?" Granholm replied, "Wow, I hadn't thought about the racial overtones."

And I hadn't thought, until New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd educated me, that GOP budget-cutters were "cannibals ... vampires ... zombies ... the metallic beasts in Alien." (She mixed all of those metaphors into one memorable paragraph.) I also learned from Katie Couric that Americans will realize Islam is not a problem when we watch "a Muslim version of The Cosby Show."

But maybe the tilt of these mainstream opinion merchants isn't so important anymore. When Jill Abramson in June became editor of The New York Times, she said her rise was like "ascending to Valhalla. In my house growing up, the Times substituted for religion. If the Times said it, it was the absolute truth." Happily, almost no one has that kind of faith anymore.

And yet, people sometimes think they're getting facts in news reports. That's why a report by correspondent Ray Suarez on PBS' NewsHour astounded me. Suarez spoke of communist Cuba's "impressive health outcomes ... no doctor shortage ... care that's both personal and persistent." Right. In reporting from Havana in 2004 I talked with doctors serving as cab drivers and bellhops to get money for their families. Some churches hosted illegal clinics because parishioners couldn't get help through official channels. A pharmacy's shelves were mostly naked. A hospital had a BYOX policy: Bring your own X-ray film.

Happy new year, in a land that's still mostly free.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: journalism; liberal; media

1 posted on 12/27/2011 4:32:57 AM PST by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rhema
Reaganesque???

I think I am gonna vomit.

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

2 posted on 12/27/2011 4:35:50 AM PST by expatguy (Donate to "An American Expat in SE Asia" By Paypal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

They are just one notch below “Nature herself mourns loss of Dear Leader...”. Totally absent morals. Journalistic ethics. The thinnest book in the Library.


3 posted on 12/27/2011 4:46:06 AM PST by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

When will the public finally get enough of the lying and warped fantasies of the Left?


4 posted on 12/27/2011 5:03:02 AM PST by Rocky (REPEAL IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

Makes me hope I die before Obama. Of course, I never watch the regime media anymore, but the thought of the effusions of overwrought sentimentality at the event are cringe-inducing. The North Korean media should take notes.


5 posted on 12/27/2011 5:18:54 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Ceterum autem censeo, Obama delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Half the time, watching “journalists” is a lot like the first time I watched the British Office: extremely uncomfortable, ridiculous and creepy enough that I literally have to walk away from it every 10 minutes or so.


6 posted on 12/27/2011 5:50:53 AM PST by Psycho_Bunny (Why do people keep telling me Killcult is a Religion Of Peace?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Judging the worst journalism of 2011

Talk about an impossible job. The way the media generally conducts business now it's a little like judging which turd smells the worst at the sewer plant.
7 posted on 12/27/2011 6:01:45 AM PST by Honcho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

“It’s time once again to relish the worst mainstream journalism”

Please.

There is nothing “mainstream” about this “journalism”.

The accurate term is “Corrupt Liberal Media”. To call it “mainstream” or even “journalism” is Orwellian.

Half of argument is the words that you chose. Lets make “Corrupt Liberal Media” a household term. That would do more to expose their bias than all the articles like this that detail their corruption.


8 posted on 12/27/2011 6:17:47 AM PST by Uncle Lonny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Suarez spoke of communist Cuba's "impressive health outcomes ... no doctor shortage ... care that's both personal and persistent."

Gee, if that's the case, I wonder why the president of Yemen wants to come here for medical treatment instead of going to Cuba. Paging Michael Moore...

9 posted on 12/27/2011 7:01:23 AM PST by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inspectorette
"Cuba"

Or why Castro had a Spanish doctor flown in when he was deathly ill (unfortunately, not finally dead) a few years back.

10 posted on 12/27/2011 8:51:01 AM PST by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Lonny

Have borrowed your ‘Corrupt Liberal Media’ comment for a tag - you OK with that?


11 posted on 12/31/2011 6:44:45 AM PST by GOPJ (Lets make “Corrupt Liberal Media” a household term. - - freeper Uncle Lonny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

“Have borrowed your ‘Corrupt Liberal Media’ comment for a tag - you OK with that”

Great!

I hope the term becomes a household phrase. Use it every time you like.

Half of argument is language and for too long we have let the left define the terms of debate.

The “mainstream” media is hardly that. It is “liberal” and corrupt to the core. The operative word is “corrupt”

“liberalism” has killed journalism.


12 posted on 12/31/2011 10:56:37 AM PST by Uncle Lonny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson