Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why did the Duggars photograph a stillborn baby? A controversial image stirs debate
Salon.com ^ | December 11, 2011 | Mary Elizabeth Williams

Posted on 12/18/2011 9:24:56 PM PST by Saundra Duffy

When the Duggar family announced last week that the baby Michelle was carrying had died in utero, it seemed the Internet couldn’t have any less sympathy toward the fertile-to-a-fault brood. Commenters right here on Salon called them “an obscenity” who are “unfairly crowding the planet with [their] disgusting obsession” and “selfish, polluting choices,” who were, in essence, “asking for it.” Then the Duggars really ticked people off.

Making good on their promise to both name and hold a memorial for the baby, the Duggars had a service Wednesday for the child they named Jubilee Shalom Duggar. At it, they shared a card that read “There is no foot too small that it cannot leave an imprint on the world” that featured a photo of the baby’s tiny feet, and another one of “Michelle holding Jubilee’s hand.”

(Excerpt) Read more at salon.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 19; duggars; stillborn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Pro abortion folks have no clue when it comes to the sacredness of human life. The Duggar's 20th child died. It is very sad. I think the photo is beautiful and shows a sacred respect for life. I hope pro life groups will use the photo to show the humanity of the unborn child. I love the Duggar family; I watch their program on TLC. God bless them.
1 posted on 12/18/2011 9:24:59 PM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Amen


2 posted on 12/18/2011 9:28:35 PM PST by Steve Newton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

It is a beautiful and sensitive photo.


3 posted on 12/18/2011 9:29:14 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (We kneel to no prince but the Prince of Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Such a tiny hand....


4 posted on 12/18/2011 9:29:25 PM PST by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve Newton

I look up to the Duggars. They are a wonderful strong family. The way they handled this tragedy is to be admired and I do admire them.

I think the photos are precious.


5 posted on 12/18/2011 9:30:07 PM PST by Saundra Duffy ( For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED

I hope pro life groups will be able to use the photos to save lives.


6 posted on 12/18/2011 9:31:04 PM PST by Saundra Duffy ( For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

The article was far more intelligent than what I expected on Salon.


7 posted on 12/18/2011 9:32:30 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (We kneel to no prince but the Prince of Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Indeed

Why this happened I don’t know.

But God does.

Trust we must


8 posted on 12/18/2011 9:33:10 PM PST by Steve Newton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYer

ping


9 posted on 12/18/2011 9:33:22 PM PST by Saundra Duffy ( For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve Newton

The baby is with Jesus which is so comforting to know.


10 posted on 12/18/2011 9:34:33 PM PST by Saundra Duffy ( For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

So love the the population reduction crowd. The kind of people that’d gun down your whole family and bury them in a ditch for their brave new world. Nothing like genocidal butchers getting on their high horse.


11 posted on 12/18/2011 9:36:13 PM PST by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
So love the the population reduction crowd. The kind of people that’d gun down your whole family and bury them in a ditch for their brave new world.

I really wish those people would take one for the team, and off themselves, then I might be impressed with their commitment to the cause.

12 posted on 12/18/2011 9:37:19 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

I think it was done very tastefully. It is also makes a statement that she was nothing less than a human baby, and was still very much loved by her family.


13 posted on 12/18/2011 9:38:21 PM PST by Peanut Gallery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Smile

Yes. Some people say when we die we go to “sleep” until the Lord returns.

I do not subscribe to this theory. Jesus said: TODAY you will be with me in paradise. I believe that. I think when we die HE is there to hold us and comfort us.

Dying is not what God intended.

We made our bed in this respect.

But I know in my heart that He will make death as gentle as possible.

Blessings to you Saundra


14 posted on 12/18/2011 9:38:44 PM PST by Steve Newton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Taking a photograph of a stillborn child, or a deceased infant is nothing new.

My wife’s grandparents did this in the 1920’s when one of their children died as an infant. All dressed up in a tiny casket.

It was a way to remember that a child really did exist.

I find no fault in what the Duggars did. It seems the libs and Left want to “Tebow” anyone who believes in sacred things.


15 posted on 12/18/2011 9:41:18 PM PST by exit82 (Democrats are the enemies of freedom. We have ideas-the Dems only have ideology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82

Well said.


16 posted on 12/18/2011 9:43:29 PM PST by Steve Newton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

It is a beautiful picture of a precious baby.


17 posted on 12/18/2011 10:00:11 PM PST by svcw (God's Grace - thank you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82

We have a large photo album from the early 1900s with quite a few photos of deceased relatives. Some were infants and they didn’t live long enough to have photos taken of them alive. You are right, this is a way to remember that they did exist.


18 posted on 12/18/2011 10:23:03 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All

There’s nothing controversial about this photo set.

It’s one of their children and it’s God’s child.


19 posted on 12/18/2011 10:29:01 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Why did the Duggars photograph a stillborn baby?

Because she was their daughter and they loved her. There's no controversy here, just guilt.

20 posted on 12/18/2011 10:31:43 PM PST by mockingbyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson