To: woofie
"I can visualize the worldstream," says Mr. Gelernter, explaining its advantages. "I know what it looks like. I know what my chunk of it looks like. When I focus on my stuff, I get a stream that is a subset of the worldstream. So when I focus the stream, by doing a search on Sam Schwartz"a hypothetical student"I do stream subtraction. Everything that isn't related to Schwartz that I'm allowed to see vanishes. And then the stream moves much more slowly. Because Sam Schwartz documents are being added at a much slower rate than all the documents in the world. So now I have a manageable trickle of stuff." Do I understand this? no
2 posted on
12/04/2011 12:29:32 AM PST by
woofie
(It takes three villages and a forest of woodland creatures to raise a child in Obamaville)
To: woofie
a highfalutin way of saying he focuses on a topic
3 posted on
12/04/2011 12:35:32 AM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
To: woofie
I think he’s basically saying that computing should adapt to your personal way of thinking, not have you adapt to it’s way of thinking.
It would be an extension of you and how you do things. A symbiotic relationship between you and the machine.
4 posted on
12/04/2011 12:54:23 AM PST by
Jonty30
(If a person won't learn under the best of times, than he must learn under the worst of times.)
To: woofie
Do I understand this? noInstead of getting Gunwalker data dumps with mostly extraneous info and more info that's not relevant, you would get all relevant data and no irrelevant data - meaning a smaller number of hits to a search over a longer time span instead of a huge dump of "possibles" that takes a long time to filter through.
8 posted on
12/04/2011 4:50:59 AM PST by
trebb
("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson