John Williams Hyperinflation Warning, Preserve Wealth Value With Gold

Among the specters lurking in ShadowStats.com's Editor John Williams' gloomy outlook for the U.S. are the demise of the dollar, hyperinflation and the ongoing lack of political will to take sound corrective measures.
Still, as he tells The Gold Report in this exclusive interview, investors have options. Williams contends that turning to gold, silver and strong foreign currencies would protect wealth and position savvy investors to take advantage of extraordinary opportunities likely to flow out of the turmoil ahead.

The Gold Report: When we talked in May, you predicted that hyperinflation could be a reality as soon as 2014, something you addressed at length in your Hyperinflation Special Report. Have six months of euro debt crises, Middle East revolts and U.S. Treasuries' downgrading altered your outlook?

John Williams: Not a bit. We still seem to be moving down that road to a relatively near-term break toward hyperinflation. The most important thing that's happened since we last talked was the global response to the U.S. legislators' negotiations over the debt-limit ceiling and the deficit reduction problems at that time. Clearly, no one controlling the White House or Congress was serious about addressing the nation's long-term solvency issues. That sparked a panic selloff on the dollar against currencies such as the Swiss franc, and of course gold, which made the gold price rally sharply.

TGR: Did the politicos learn anything from those "negotiations," as you just described them?

JW: Not at all. In fact, I'll contend that everything that's happened since then has been just a playing out of what resulted in a complete collapse in global confidence in the dollar. The ensuing rapid shift of market focus to crises in the euro area was really more of a foil to distract the global markets from the dollar.
Following that horrendous performance by Congress and the White House, the global markets indicated a major loss of confidence in the dollar that had been coming. I think that's now established and in place. The dollar is doomed to lose its reserve status eventually, and any day now, we may see things heat up again over the deficit negotiations.

TGR: What steps would we see on the way to the dollar losing its reserve status?

JW: Probably the biggest thing would be heavy selling pressure against the U.S. dollar, along with a spike in the stronger currencies such as the Swiss franc. The more the pressure builds for selling of the dollar, the more expensive and disruptive it will be for the Swiss National Bank to keep supporting the euro so I don't think that intervention will last long.

As heavy selling of the dollar develops against the Swiss franc, the Canadian dollar and the Australian dollar, and the gold price rallies, we'll see a very strong effort by those who are dependent on the dollar—such as the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)—to have the dollar removed from the pricing of oil. Along with that will come a movement to change the dollar's reserve status.

TGR: If other countries start demanding payment in alternative currencies, how can investors protect themselves against a shift from the dollar standard?

JW: I'm not a day-to-day timer in this. My outlook has been consistent that we're heading into U.S. dollar hyperinflation, and the effective purchasing power of the currency as we know it will disappear. If you're living in a U.S. dollar-denominated world, you don't want to be in dollars—you want to move to protect the purchasing power of your assets, your wealth.

To do that, I look very specifically at physical gold, preferably gold coins and silver, and assets outside the U.S. dollar. The currencies I like the best are the Swiss franc, the Australian dollar and the Canadian dollar. This is something you do for survival over the long haul because you're likely to see all sorts of volatility in the short term.

But once you ride through the storm, if you've been able to preserve your wealth and assets in terms of their purchasing power and to maintain liquidity—which the physical gold and the currencies will give you—you'll be in a position to take care of yourself and take advantage of some extraordinary investment opportunities that likely would flow out of the turmoil ahead.

In the interim, I wouldn't start betting that next week we're going to see the dollar do this or that. This is a long-term hedge strategy, an insurance policy against the hyperinflation that I view as inevitable due to the long-range insolvency of the U.S.

JW: Severely slashing social programs such as Social Security and Medicare would be the only way it could be avoided. I don't have any problem per se with Social Security or Medicare, but you can't bring things into balance without addressing them. If you look at the U.S. annual deficit on a GAAP basis—generally accepted accounting principles—with accounting for the year-to-year change and the net present value of unfunded liabilities in Social Security, Medicare and such, you're seeing a federal deficit in excess of $5 trillion per year.

Putting that in perspective, if you wanted to raise taxes, you could take 100% of people's salaries and the government would still be in deficit. You could cut every penny of government spending, except for Social Security and Medicare, and you'd still be in deficit.

You can't escape the eventual hyperinflation if those programs are not addressed. Originally, I was looking for hyperinflation by the end of this decade. I've advanced it to 2014, and it may well come before that. I think we're already in the early stages of going through what has to happen for this to break.

TGR: But would politicians touch those entitlement programs in an election year?

JW: No one wants this, but the federal government and the Federal Reserve have backed us into a corner and there's no other way of escaping. There's no political will to address the long-range insolvency, so they kick the proverbial can down the road. They did that in 2008. They did everything they could to prevent a systemic collapse by creating, spending and guaranteeing whatever money they had to.

We're coming to another point where we face risk of systemic collapse, and we're likely going to see another round of quantitative easing (QE) as a result. That also could pull the trigger for massive dollar selling, moving us into much higher inflation. That will start the final process.

TGR: One of your recent newsletters showed that annual core inflation had risen for 12 straight months, ever since QE2. What would QE3 do to some of the indicators you watch—gold, silver, commodities?

JW: Gold tends to anticipate the inflation problems. All sorts of factors hitting gold create tremendous volatility, but generally it will continue to move higher as the broad crisis deepens. Then as we get into the high inflation, it will start soaring. People have to keep in mind that they're preserving the purchasing power of the dollars that they put into gold. If gold gets up to $100,000/ounce (oz) as you start breaking into the hyperinflation, and they bought gold at $2,000/oz, it isn't that they made $98,000 per ounce. Instead, they've maintained the purchasing power of the dollars they put into gold.

They've also lost the purchasing power of the dollars that they didn't put into gold or some other hard asset. That's a different view than most people look at with investments, but this is not a normal investment environment. Again, this is one where you batten down the hatches and look to preserve wealth and assets, as opposed to trying to make money day to day in the markets. Once you have your basics covered, then you take gambling money and go play Wall Street's casino.

As to core inflation, the Fed likes to ignore energy and food prices, using the rationale that those prices are too volatile and don't hold over time. Yet, oil is probably the most important single commodity in terms of domestic inflation. Not only does it hit basic energy costs, but it also affects the cost of transportation of all goods. Beyond what is defined as basic energy costs, oil is also the basic raw material for many products, ranging from chemicals to fertilizers to pharmaceuticals and plastics.

As oil prices rise, the Fed just takes out the energy component in so-called core inflation. But the inflation still spreads to the broader economy. When they started to jawbone on QE2 in October of 2010, year-to-year inflation on a core basis was at 0.6%. In the consumer price index reporting of October 2011, despite a drop in the gasoline prices, core inflation was at 2.1%. In response to QE2, gold rose against the dollar and the dollar weakened against other currencies. The weaker dollar, in turn, spiked oil prices. The higher oil prices spiked gasoline prices and broader inflation, which still is boosting consumer inflation in the U.S.

With the next round of Fed easing, the dollar problems will intensify again. That will put new upside pressure on oil and gasoline prices, further intensifying the spreading broad inflation pressures in consumer goods and services.

The Fed's mandate from the government is to try and sustain reasonable economic growth and contain inflation. From the Fed's standpoint, however, those are secondary to maintaining the solvency of the banking system. Nothing in the outlook for the system has changed meaningfully since the crisis in September 2008. The banking system still is in a solvency crisis, the economy continues to worsen and we've had no real recovery. The stopgap measures to prevent collapse of the system did nothing but kick the crisis a little further into the future, and now, we're coming to peak period of crisis again.

TGR: You've repeatedly said that the global economic crisis is not Europe's fault but part of a pending systemic collapse that started with the manipulation of the U.S. financial markets—the moves you've been talking about. What countries or sectors will suffer the most if the crisis continues?

JW: The more closely they're tied to the dollar, the greater the inflation impact will be in other areas, but the runaway inflation I'm talking about will be largely in the U.S. and for people living in a U.S. dollar-denominated world.

That's from an inflation standpoint. Yet, it also will have an extremely negative impact on the U.S. economy, and problems in the U.S. economy indeed will have a global impact. The U.S. economy is still the largest in the world, and you can't push it deeper into a depression without having negative economic consequences outside the U.S.

But while the global economic problems will worsen, systems can ride out bad economies. We can't ride out a hyperinflation because the currency becomes worthless. That's an ultimate crisis that forces a resetting of the system.

JW: Dump the dollar. China needs to delink from the dollar, and it will be forced to do so. It's importing inflation. If China doesn't want that inflation problem, all it has to do is cut its link with the dollar, and oil suddenly becomes a lot cheaper.

TGR: But how practical would it be for China to sell off all the U.S. dollars and U.S. Treasuries it holds?

JW: In terms of insulating itself against U.S. inflation, all China has to do is delink its currency from the U.S. dollar. That's true of other currencies as well. The Swiss franc is artificially linked to the euro now, but because of the general weakness in the dollar, it's ironically also intervening to support the dollar against the euro.

Whenever major holders of dollar-denominated assets decide to sell those assets, that will determine how large a loss they will take on the U.S. currency.

JW: I wouldn't bet on a long-term survival of the euro, but I think it will survive the current crisis as long as its survival is needed to prevent a systemic collapse in the U.S. The Fed will do whatever it has to do to keep Europe's problems from imploding the U.S. banking system. It can create whatever money it wants to do that.

Long term, I would not look at the euro as surviving in its current form. The loss of the dollar eventually will force a reexamination of the global currency structure. That might be a time when other currency disorders get resolved and we may see the euro break up. It was never practical to think that all the countries within the euro would be able to align their economic and fiscal policies in a way that would enable them to operate together. The euro was doomed from the beginning.

TGR: Let's go back to gold. According to your research, the September 2011 high of $1,895/oz gold was below the historic high of $850/oz in 1980, if the 1980 figure was adjusted for inflation. The $850/oz in 1980 would have equaled $2,479/oz in Consumer Price Index–all Urban consumers (CPIU)-adjusted dollars, or $8,677/oz Shadow Government Statistics (SGS)-alternate-CPI-adjusted gold prices in 2011. Is gold underpriced if you put it into that context?

JW: On that basis, yes, it is. It also depends on when you measure it. My hyperinflation report looks at what has happened to the dollar over a longer period. Since President Roosevelt took the U.S. off the gold standard domestically in 1933, the dollar has lost 98–99% of its purchasing power. People tend to forget that. But if you look at the gold price movement since 1933, it actually has moved a little more than the government-reported pace of inflation. My estimate of what inflation should be if we had consistent CPI reporting shows that the loss of the dollar's purchasing power against gold is the same as it is measured by the CPI.

So over time—and this is true over millennia—gold tends to maintain purchasing power, which means it holds its value net of inflation. Not that you'd break a piece of gold down to a small enough unit to buy a loaf of bread, but if you did, it also would have bought a loaf of bread in ancient Rome.

JW: Same amount of gold. Gold has a long tradition as store of wealth. That's why—globally—gold generally has been viewed as such. It only got bad press in the U.S. because private ownership of gold was outlawed after Roosevelt's action. It became legal for Americans to own gold again after Nixon abandoned the international gold standard. Yet, even today, some on Wall Street discourage investment in physical gold, largely because they cannot make a commission on it, as they do with stocks and bonds.

Given the gold ownership limitations after 1933, those in the U.S. who wanted to buy gold turned to buying gold stocks. But because of what happened in the 1930s—that's now two generations or so ago—gold as an investment and as a hedge to protect wealth lost some of what had been its commonly recognized value in the U.S. Outside the U.S., almost everyone views gold as a traditional hedge.

TGR: That's physical gold. What about exchange-traded funds and gold equities in the juniors? Will those investments also preserve wealth?

JW: I wouldn't count on the financial system working as it should. I look at physical gold, preferably sovereign coins, not only as a store of wealth, but also for purposes of liquidity.

Gold stocks also should preserve wealth over time, but I would look at them as longer-term holdings. There could be periods of systemic failure with resulting interim liquidity issues.

TGR: You talked about hyperinflation coming as early as 2014, or even before that. But 2012 is just weeks away. What can people expect next year in terms of the data you watch and maintain versus some of the government-issued statistics?

JW: I can tell you that the economy is weaker and will remain weaker than the government reports. We don't have an economic recovery in place. We'll tend to see higher inflation.

Walter J. "John" Williams has been a private consulting economist and a specialist in government economic reporting for 30 years, working with individuals and Fortune 500 companies alike. He received his bachelor's in economics, ***** laude, from Dartmouth College in 1971 and earned his masters in business administration from Dartmouth's Amos Tuck School of Business Administration in 1972, where he was named an Edward Tuck Scholar. Williams, whose early work prompted him to study economic reporting and interview key government officials involved in the process, also surveyed business economists for their thinking about the quality of government statistics. What he learned led to front-page stories in the New York Times and Investor's Business Daily, considerable coverage in the broadcast media and a joint meeting with representatives of all of the government's statistical agencies. Despite a number of changes to the system since those days, Williams says that government reporting has deteriorated sharply in the last decade or so. His analyses and commentaries, which are available on his ShadowStats.com website, have been featured widely in the popular domestic and international media.

Here we have one of the world's foremost goldbugs including FOREIGN CURRENCIES as a hedge along with Gold.

Debt Deflation.

Goldbugs will be hammered in the early stanges...and if they have enough to eat, will stay even in the long term.

Theoretically fine - if you bought your gold before 2005. Gold has overshot short-term inflation and is a speculative commodity now. It will probably not fall below the inflation-adjusted price of 2005. But it will not follow the inflation trend until the dollar falls enough to catch up to it. It may lose value in the short term if major sovereign stocks are forced into liquidation.

Buy AMMUNITION, not Gold.

It’s cheaper and, besides, when it get to the point that my gold is “essential to my survival”; I’ll probably be using it to buy ammunition anyway.

I figure that’ll I’ll just skip an unnecessary step ...... and, hey, I can always trade extra ammo for gold. ;)

So, are you saying it is too late to buy gold and silver to preserve the value of one’s savings?

I can understand that buying gold in paper form is risking the loss of everything, but what about the bullion and coins?

If these are not a good store of value, then what is?

My thinkin’, EXACTLY! LOL!

I was only halfway kiddin’, earlier. A few days ago, somebody posted a link to a Bosnian War survivor’s site. He said that his gold was gone in a matter of weeks and it went to buy ammo and guns. His story was a real “eye-opener”.

"Yup, guns, ammo, and food. Or maybe just guns and ammo. Cannibalism isn’t so bad when you’re starving. Just fatten up the neighbors while you still can. "

Yup.

They'll be coming for your stuff...

Cornel West: Ultimate Fight For Entitlements Will Be In "The Streets"

The time to buy an inflation hedge is when commodity prices are stable and inflation is constant.

The comparison of gold prices today with the inflation-adjusted one-day spike in 1980 is useless unless you are saying today’s price is also a spike, to complete the analogy.

You cannot preserve value if you buy at a market top. The long-term trend line of gold is not spike to spike but a line drawn under the long term market. Anything over that is pure speculation as speculation is in any commodity at any time. If you bought the 1980 peak (at which time inflation was 13% but about to be reigned in), you are still under water.

So, if I read you correctly (always a dangerous assumption), you are saying that those of us who have saved in our little bank accounts are just plain up the creek - no paddle.

No way to protect the value of our depreciating dollars?

What are orphans and soon-to-be widows to do?

Widows and orphans should have been in gold already. Inflation has been with us for 80 years. There were plenty of opportunities.

Little bank accounts - operating capital with a little backup - aren’t worth being concerned over. The issue is income preservation. If that comes from savings, then be in something that produces income. Its nominal equity value will pace inflation - if it stays in business. If income is fixed or from wages and is spent on living, there is nothing you can do. It is better than losing money.

I bought gold mostly in 1999-2002 and still hold it. I should want you to help keep driving it up.

Please consider that some of us are retires, caring for disabled husbands, trying to make the savings last so we won’t be a burden to our children.

:::Sigh:::

according to you, I better get them ready to step up to the plate, even as they have to pay more and more into the .gov maw, which swallows up everything in it’s path, with no escape.

Boy, what a gloomy picture you paint. Might as well go out on the ice floe, and let nature take it’s course.

Buy AMMUNITION, not Gold.

If you have no ammo, and can use it, and have at most a couple thousand dollars to spare, you’re right.

But if you have $10,000 or $100,000 to save (or more) then ammo Stop(s) Making Sense.

Most people cannot escape calamities. That’s what makes them calamities.

Calamity during which nearly everyone escapes is called “normalcy”.

I guess it’s really a question of how “bad” “Bad” gets.

Taking Gold from folks is easy. Taking guns and ammo?

Not so much.

I understood the point being made here. I was just having some fun with the Gold Bugs. :)

I guess it’s really a question of how “bad” “Bad” gets.

Taking Gold from folks is easy. Taking guns and ammo?

Not so much.

I understood the point being made here. I was just having some fun with the Gold Bugs. :)

A few morons might take our “fun” as endorsement for murder and theft. Maybe lighter up on the “fun” these days, huh?

More importantly, no sensible gold advocate suggests buying gold before you have the means to defend your property.

Maybe, but not if they read closely. [shrug]

Gold is a hedge. That’s it. It never hurts to have a little .... just in case ..But, I’m old enough to remember the early ‘80’s. I’ve seen this movie.

http://inflationdata.com/inflation/images/charts/Gold/Gold_inflation_chart.htm

Gold is a hedge. That’s it.

That’s a lot. It’s hard to think of any other compact and widely accepted store of wealth that has held its value over the centuries.

I also advise caution when adjusting gold for inflation. In a sense, gold is already adjusted for inflation. Think of it this way: if we define inflation based on the cost of, say, washing machines, then if we adjust the cost of washing machines for inflation, the cost will remain constant.

Gold is a lot like washing machines as a commodity or good. The correlation between the price of washing machines (and the other goods that make up the inflation indices) is pretty strong, because both gold and consumer goods increase in price when there is inflation.

Also, when you invoke the 1980 peak, you imply that one might have bought all in at the peak. No one advocates buying all at once. Smart money averages in to the market, and someone starting in 1980 will have done quite well.

> No one advocates buying all at once. Smart money averages in to the market, and someone starting in 1980 will have done quite well.

This is correct. I have not been buying quite that long, but I have spent (invested?) approx $80,000 on gold and silver through the years. As of today, it is worth approx $200,000. I don’t expect it to go down to $80,000 again in my lifetime. Beyond that, who cares.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.