Ummm, and why should people get benefits from the government—if they’re:
A) Neglecting their children’s health
B) Making their kids a danger as carriers to others
C) Putting their own superstitious anti-science bias above their own family’s health and the health of others?
“Australians told to immunize children or loose family tax breaks”
Do the Aussies spell “lose” as “loose”?
Take the King’s Coin, do the King’s Bidding.
Simian Virus 40 (SV40):A Cancer Causing Monkey Virus from FDA-Approved Vaccines
Forcing people to inject known toxins into their children at the most vulnerable time in their lives ...hmmmmm particularly irrational vaccines for homosexual drug addicts like Hep B. 3-doses of this poison and no harm????? Right. No connection with Autism and vaccinations when the “epidemic” coincided with the tripling of vaccines and the mass grouping of toxins in one shot....hmmmmmm.
No one is logical anymore....they think this is ALL “good” and govt. does what is “best”. hmmmmmmm
Very Sick and fascistic.
They elected a socialist. What did they expect?
Zero and Julia Gillard got along very well on Zero’s recent waste of jet fuel.
Gillard, however is prolly a moderate socialist - on social issues- compared to Zero. She does not support gay marriage but is pro-abortion with a wink to “understanding the moral issues”...
Not sure I understand the headline, but I assume this means that if they don't immunize children, more choices as to tax breaks will become available to them.
Next they will require Gardasil and fun can really begin for those tennie-boppers...just like here in Texas (almost).
Big government tyranny strikes again.
Versions of this same tactic abound all over the globe, especially here in the United States.
“Purse strings”, they’re called.
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!