To: Kurt Evans
unfortunate that he is picking up support from Reagan conservatives who should be spending their time doing more useful things.
They say they are defenders of the Constitution, but do they really follow the decisions of the court? Were they there in opposition the Kagan? Did they defend Alito against attacks during his nomination fight? Will they be there the next time a Souter or Meyers is put forward?
Will they really do a thing to stop Romney’s drive toward the nomination?
42 posted on
11/17/2011 3:35:04 PM PST by
campaignPete R-CT
(I will go back to New Hampshire to campaign.)
To: campaignPete R-CT
>They say they are defenders of the Constitution, but do they really follow the decisions of the court? Were they there in opposition the Kagan? Did they defend Alito against attacks during his nomination fight? Will they be there the next time a Souter or Meyers is put forward?
Speaking only for myself, yes, yes, yes, and yes.
>Will they really do a thing to stop Romneys drive toward the nomination?
Does keeping him from winning Iowa count?
55 posted on
11/17/2011 3:47:25 PM PST by
Kurt Evans
(This message not approved by any candidate or candidate's committee.)
To: campaignPete R-CT
"but do they really follow the decisions of the court? "What has the Court go to do with the Constitution?
"Were they there in opposition the Kagan?"
Darn right we were opposing the Kagan nomination!
We are always in opposition to liberal SC nominations.
Our steadfast support for RP should tell you that we don't want Romney.
137 posted on
11/18/2011 7:53:44 AM PST by
Designer
(Nit-pickin' and chagrinin')
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson