Posted on 11/15/2011 10:41:11 AM PST by smoothsailing
November 15, 2011
By Dick Polman
The prediction game has always been treacherous. Witness ABC News' documentary, aired in November 1962 and entitled "The Political Obituary of Richard Nixon," a solid piece of conventional wisdom that was rendered moot six years later when Nixon rose from the dead to win the White House.
And here's what the conventional wisdom looked like in the spring of 2011: House Republican leader Eric Cantor said that Newt Gingrich's candidacy was essentially "finished." Conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer said of Newt, "He's done." Republican commentator and ex-Gingrich aide Rich Galen likened his old boss' candidacy to "an airliner with no wings, no engines, and no landing gear."
There was also a guy who dismissed Newt as "dead man talking." That was me.
But Newt now seems to have refuted the novelist F. Scott Fitzgerald's famous quip that "there are no second acts in American lives." When Newt was down, he alone foresaw an upward trajectory. Apparently he preferred this Fitzgerald dictum: "Never confuse a single defeat with a final defeat."
According to a bevy of new polls released yesterday, Newt's act has been renewed. He has risen from the ashes of his springtime implosion, when at least 16 top staffers walked out on him. He has vaulted past the clueless Herman Cain and the hapless Rick Perry to become the newest favorite of the not-Mitt constituency. He has also been helped by the debates, due to his ability to string together coherent sentences and disport himself as the smartest person on stage. (The debates have also afforded him free publicity, a priceless asset for a guy whose campaign ledger was bleeding red ink at the end of last month.)
Whether his boomlet can be sustained is, of course, another matter entirely. It's not as if the Romney-averse Republicans have suddenly awoken to discover that a cross between Cicero and Reagan has been living in their midst. No, Newt has risen largely by default. If Perry hadn't turned out to be such a bust, if Cain hadn't been ensnared by scandal and exposed as a know-nothing, if Michele Bachmann hadn't revealed herself to be serially fact-challenged, and indeed if any of the GOP's heavy-hitting governors had agreed to take the plunge, then we'd probably look like seers today for having decreed Newt dead last May.
Bottom line? Newt's ascendance to flavor of the month (or week) is not really about Newt at all. He's just a symptom of the extreme volatility of this Republican race. Seventy-five percent of grassroots Republicans are so anxious to resist Romney that they will audition just about anybody else (except Rick Santorum, Ron Paul, or Jon Huntsman) - to the point where they're willing to forget all the things about Newt that they didn't like.
It's amazing what willful amnesia can accomplish. Just last spring, conservatives went bonkers when Newt assailed Paul Ryan's kill-Medicare plan as "right-wing social engineering," and when he remarked that "all of us have a responsibility to pay for health care" (remember, the '90s Newt argued in favor of requiring Americans to buy health coverage - the centerpiece of today's health reform law). And it wasn't long ago that conservatives were turned off by Newt's multiple marriages (whereas, apparently, Newt's three marriages are now deemed more acceptable than Cain's three sex harassment accusations).
The really weird thing, however, is that the Romney skeptics, in their search for a credible outsider with no Washington taint, have wound up flocking (at least for the moment) to a veteran Washington insider. Newt has been around the Washington power game decades longer than Barack Obama. His track record inside the Beltway dates back to the disco era. And, lest the newly besotted conservatives forget (which they apparently have), Newt as House Speaker was frequently attacked by the Republican right as insufficiently conservative. Among other sins, he cut budget deals with Bill Clinton and defended the National Endowment for the Arts. He ticked off the House conservatives so much that they tried to topple him from the Speaker's chair in 1997.
The coup failed, but Newt managed to topple himself a year later, when he championed the impeachment drive against Clinton while simultaneously conducting his own extra-marital affair. His impeachment zeal turned off the voters, who rewarded the Democrats in the '98 midterm elections - thereby prompting Newt's resignation from the House.
Newt's boomleteers seem eager to wipe his slate clean, but the big question is whether they'll remain so oblivious once the inevitable scrutiny is ratcheted up. Indeed, the process has already begun. In Iowa yesterday, an anti-Newt flyer, sponsored by the "Iowans for Christian Leaders in Government," assailed his three marriages, questioned his fealty to God, and sought to remind people that Newt had served divorce papers on wife number one while she was recovering from cancer surgery.
Will Newt's new fans stay loyal and sustain his poll status? Are they so enamored of his debate performances (they apparently think he'd match up well against Barack Obama) that they will happily overlook his inconvenient history? If the not-Mitt crowd chooses to wallow in amnesia, it will merely confirm what F. Scott Fitzgerald once said about the fine art of forgetting:
"It is sadder to find the past again, and find it inadequate to the present."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2807007/posts?page=50#50
I couldn't agree more.
Excellent piece.
“I wouldn’t trust him for dog catcher much less the presidency.”
That why we have elections. The last time conservatives felt this way, we got Obama.
I never knew an elephant in its death throes could flail around so.
That why we have elections. The last time conservatives felt this way, we got Obama.
Why don't you tell that to the man who said it? I merely quoted him.
Thanks for posting the link, it’s a good quote and the boss nails it.
I seldom finish the month with more than a dollar or two left. If I can contribute ten dollars a month then anyone can. This forum is one of a few almost sane harbors in an insane world. Please help pay for our megaphone, put your money where your mouth is.
Respectfully
W.W.SMITH
Amnesia is not as debilitating as blindness!
Look forward and assess your options.
Wishing is for kids.
Thank you for supporting Free Republic!
If you're interested in who donates, click here
You'll find my name there.
I know who I can support, and Gingrich doesn’t make the cut. You can have him.
I have my own concerns about Newt, but I'll listen to right-wing commentary and not this pinhead.
I find some of these comments interesting. If we don't want RINO Newt we must want Obama or we're trying to reelect Obama or we'll get stuck with 4 more years of Obama, blah, blah, blah. It could scarcely get kookier than that.
This must be a case of "it takes a slug to know a slug". Gingrich is a slug, and I don't care who this Polman guy is, he's got Gingrich figured out.
If we dump Newt I’m sure Polman will be right there to attack whoever remains. Newt has baggage but the more I see the more I realize that he has the atributes we need at this time. Is it really necessary to keep posting his positives? I also beleive that he knows that a RIGHT (2nd Amendment) is a RIGHT of ALL the people of every State and locale and is NOT a States Right Issue.
You can have him.
If we dump Newt I’m sure Polman will be right there to attack whoever remains. Newt has baggage but the more I see the more I realize that he has the atributes we need at this time. Is it really necessary to keep posting his positives? I also beleive that he knows that a RIGHT (2nd Amendment) is a RIGHT of ALL the people of every State and locale and is NOT a States Right Issue.
What, you feel a need to squander another decade following false flags?
Polman is a maroon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.