Posted on 11/09/2011 4:55:18 AM PST by Kaslin
Many Wall Street occupiers are echoing the Communist Party USA's call to "Save the nation! Tax corporations! Tax the rich!" There are other Americans, on both the left and the right -- for example, President Barack Obama and House Speaker John Boehner -- who call for reductions in corporate taxes. But the University of California, Berkeley's pretend economist Robert Reich disagrees, saying, "The economy needs two whopping corporate tax cuts right now as much as someone with a serious heart condition needs Botox." Let's look at corporate taxes and ask, "Who pays them?"
Virginia has a car tax. Does the car pay the tax? In most political jurisdictions, there's a property tax. Does property pay the tax? You say: "Williams, that's lunacy. Neither a car nor property pays taxes. Only flesh-and-blood people pay taxes!" What about a corporation? As it turns out, a corporation is an artificial creation of the legal system and, as such, a legal fiction. A corporation is not a person and therefore cannot pay taxes. When tax is levied on a corporation, who pays it?
There's an entire subject area in economics, known as tax incidence, that investigates who bears the burden of a tax. It turns out that the burden of a tax is not necessarily borne by the party or entity upon whom it is levied. For example, if a sales tax is levied on a cigarette retailer, the retailer does not bear the full burden of the tax. Part of it will be shifted forward to customers in the form of higher product prices. The exact amount of the shifting depends upon market supply and demand conditions.
What about raising taxes on corporations as a means to get them to pay their "rightful share of government"? If a tax is levied on a corporation and if it is to survive, it will have one of several responses or some combination thereof. One response is to raise the price of its product, so customers share part of the burden. Another response is to lower dividends, so shareholders share a part of the burden. And a considerable portion of reduced dividend burden falls on ordinary non-rich people. According to the Tax Foundation, 19 percent of federal tax returns report dividend income but 42 percent of taxpayers older than 65 report dividend income. Therefore, it is people, not some legal fiction called a corporation, who bear the burden of the tax. Because corporations have these responses to the imposition of a tax, they are merely government tax collectors.
The largest burden of corporate taxes is borne by workers. We discover that by asking a simple question, such as: Which workers on a road construction project earn the higher pay, those employed moving dirt with shovels and wheelbarrows or those doing the same atop giant earthmovers? You'd guess the guys operating the earthmovers, but why? It's not because they're unionized or because construction contractors have a fondness for earthmover operators. It's because those workers have more capital (tools) to work with and are thereby more productive. Higher productivity translates into higher wages.
Tax policies that raise the cost of capital formation -- such as capital gains taxes, low depreciation allowances and corporate taxes -- reduce capital formation. As a result, workers have less capital, lower productivity and lower wage growth. In 1980, Joseph Stiglitz, now a Nobel laureate, said that workers share the highest corporate tax burden in the form of lower wages. A number of economic studies, including that of the Congressional Budget Office, show that workers bear anywhere from 45 to 75 percent of the corporate tax burden. Adding to the burden is the fact that capital has the kind of mobility that labor doesn't. Corporate capital can flee to other countries easily, but workers cannot.
Politicians and leftist elite get away with corporate tax demagoguery because economists haven't done well in making our subject understandable to ordinary people, not to mention that we have derelict news media people with little understanding.
Yup. Supposedly conservative politicians are now spinning a tax increase as new revenues. They must think we’re stupid. This kind of lack of respect of our intelligence and common sense is a bipartisan affliction.
We have a dishonest tax structure.
“The largest burden of corporate taxes is borne by workers.”
The above comment is partially correct in that corporate tax’s does remove operating funds from the opportunity to be used for rewarding employees. However, after it’s all said and done taxes of whatever type eventually fall through to be paid by the consumer. I have always found it amusing that so many people do not comprehend this and continually yap about sticking it to the rich corporate fat cats when in reality any increase in taxes is sticking it to themselves. And so it goes....
Good points
The President of the United States of America does not understand this most economic basic truth.
ONLY PEOPLE CAN PAY TAXES! Not businesses, or cars, or trees, or toilets, etc.
How can we expect the idiots who voted for this president to understand it?
Back when I had Managers that worked under me, I had one particularly astute colleague ask me how we can charge a client $65/hour for his time but only pay him $25/hour on salary. I explained to him he wasn't getting paid $35/hour. He was taking home about $26/hour after the guvmnts took their fair share. Then I sat down with a piece of paper and showed him what it costs us to pay him that $25/hour after taxes, benefits, unemployment insurance, etc. After all the calculations worked out, the company made an hourly profit on his time charged to clients of about $3.
He is a very conservative voter to this day.
So now he wants to tax CHRISTMAS TREES! God save the Republic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.