This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 11/05/2011 6:37:41 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 11/05/2011 4:47:52 AM PDT by Dusty Road
The settlement agreement between the National Restaurant Association and a woman who accused Herman Cain of sexual harassment was reached in September 1999--and was not signed by Cain himself, according to Joel Bennett, a lawyer for the woman.
---------------------------------
Cain left the association June 30, 1999, according to the NRA. Under that timeline, Cain would have been gone when the settlement was reached--and may well have been gone when she filed the complaint
-------------------------------------------
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57318500-503544/cain-did-not-sign-settlement-accusers-lawyer-says/%20http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504564_162-57318500-504564/cain-did-not-sign-settlement-accusers-lawyer-says
Sorry about the link, not sure why it didn’t come up right. I’m not very good at this.
Thank you, I’m old and it’s early. May need a little whisky in the coffee.
If I understood correctly, my understanding from yesterday is that Cain wasn’t even AWARE of the settlement - it was directly between the (Restaurant) NRA and the woman.
Cain wasn’t even involved.
Did I understand that correctly?
This is all a charade. Politico is starting to appear to have been way, way out of line with this.
Not even fake but accurate. Just plain wrong.
Beyond Dan Rather territory.
We still don’t know what he supposedly did.
This is the New Coke of political scandals.
This is not possible.
The Perry Banditos have been insisting for days that Cain admitted wrong doing over a decade ago, rather than simply having been the target of accusations as this would indicate.
Maybe she was going to follow Cain to his next job, just like Anita Hill did to Clarence Thomas!
The source was a Romney Bought RomneyBOT.
And the core GOP will LOVE Romney for the backstabbing.
Let me see now.... A woman files suit for an alleged harassment by a man she worked with IN THE PAST. AFTER he’s left the organization—and presumably she’s had NOTHING more to do with him (and will never have to face him in the future)—she gets paid off to leave that organization????
And we wonder why US business is NOT as competitive as it once was?
“First thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.” -Shakespeare, Henry VI, Pt. 2, Act 4, Scene 2
Rick Heads trying to kill the other candidates when their own is already dead.
This whole episode has been about as sleazy and underhanded as possible.
1. No one on the record.
2. Anonymous accusers
3. Non-specific complaint.
4. Violation of confidentiality agreement.
5. Media gave Cain a dribble then demanded a response. THen dribbled more of #3 then demanded to know why his story changed.
This was “gotcha” journalism from the first instant the story was even contemplated.
Have a name?
Whenever Team Romney had rumors they wanted to start about other candidates,
Jonathan Martin has been their go-to guy to get those rumors in writing in front of a national audience.
Who benefits most from Sanford meltdown? Californian (that's right) Mitt Romney
"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"
"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"
"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"
"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"
"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"
So much for the “He left because of the complaint being filed”. The complaint was filed AFTER he left.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.