Posted on 10/12/2011 4:02:57 PM PDT by Syncro
Read More »WINGLESS, BLOODSUCKING AND PARASITIC: MEET THE FLEA PARTY!
October 12, 2011So far, the only major accomplishment of the "Occupy Wall Street" protesters is that it has finally put an end to their previous initiative, "Occupy Our Mothers' Basements."
Oddly enough for such a respectable-looking group -- a mixture of adolescents looking for a cause, public sector union members, drug dealers, criminals, teenage runaways, people who have been at every protest since the Berkeley Free Speech Movement, people 95 percent of whosehair is concentrated in their ponytails, Andrea Dworkin look-alikes and other average Democrats -- they can't even explain what they're protesting.
The protesters either treat inquiries about their purpose as a trick question, or -- worse -- instantly rattle off a series of insane causes: "No. 1, abolish capitalism; No. 2, because 9/11 was an inside job; No. 3, because Mumia is innocent ..."
Curiously, the only point universally agreed upon by the protesters and their admirers in the Democratic Party and the mainstream media is that "Occupy Wall Street" should be compared to the tea party. Yes, that would be the same tea party that has been denounced and slandered by the Democratic Party and the mainstream media for the lastthree years.
As a refresher: The Democratic National Committee called the tea partiers "angry mobs" and "rabid right-wing extremists." ABC said they were a "mob." CNN accused them of "rabble rousing." Harry Reid called them "evil mongers." Nancy Pelosi said they were "un-American." CNN's Anderson Cooper and every single host on MSNBC called the tea partiers a name that referred to an obscure gay sex act.
But apparently liberals couldn't even convince themselves that tea partiers were an extremist group unworthy of emulation.
At least they're embarrassed about what the OWS protesters really are: wingless, bloodsucking and parasitic. This is the flea party, not the tea party.
Contrary to all the blather you always hear about how lawless street protests and civil disobedience are part of the American tradition -- "what our troops are fighting for!" -- they are not. We are an orderly people with democratic channels at our disposal to change our government.
The very reason we have a constitutional republic is because of a mob uprising. Soon after the American Revolution, Shays' Rebellion so terrified and angered Americans that they demanded a federal government capable of crushing such mobs.
Now liberals compare their every riot, every traffic blockage, every Starbucks-window-smashing street protest to the civil rights movement - which was only necessary because of them. These "Occupy Wall Street" ignoramuses seem to imagine they are blacks living in 1963 Alabama under Democratic governor George Wallace.
Read the rest at AnnCoulter.Com
But apparently liberals couldn't even convince themselves that tea partiers were an extremist group unworthy of emulation.
At least they're embarrassed about what the OWS protesters really are: wingless, bloodsucking and parasitic. This is the flea party, not the tea party.
Maybe smebody can photoshop the captions of the life cycle of the flea to something more appropriate to today's fleabaggers.
Be interesting to see how quickly “flea party”, “flea bagger” and other such aspersion is picked up by the MSM. Probably like never...and that is a problem.
MSM would be the Flea Party Media or FPM.
I’m really tempted to make up a “Flea party” tee shirt, wear it, go down there and sit in with them and hold up obnoxiously sarcastic signs: “Work sucks I want free money” or “Rich people create jobs but I don’t want a job”
This name has been around for at least a week:
F reeloading
L iberals
E ncouraging
A rnachy
Ann's verbiage is always a pleasure.
I can’t take Ann seriously anymore as a voice of conservatism. She supports Romney, Christy, and “homosexual” republicans. She is not a real conservative, and even when she makes a funny point...I don’t find her “funny” anymore.
I think real conservatives should shun her. Maybe she would see the light and get back on the right path. However, until she turns from foolishness...I won’t even read her columns.
Your concise comment reveals a lot. You won't read what Ann has to say, but you already know what she thinks. Amazing!How did a head-in-the-sand "critical thinker" like you ever come to Free Republic?
They are not in the tradition of the tea partiers, much less our founding fathers. They are not in the tradition of the civil rights movement or Operation Rescue. They are in the tradition of Shays' Rebellion, the Weathermen and Charles Manson.
Let me know if you'd like to be added to the Ann Coulter ping list.
Sola Verita is probably just fat and terribly unhappy.
Ann is brilliant and always cuts through the core of the liberal mind.
You can shun. I plan to continue reading her columns (thank you for posting them, Syncro) and occasionally a book off the shelf, when I want a laugh. She has some positions with which I disagree, but oh well: so does everyone else.
I’ll see your ping and raise you a bump.
“You can shun. I plan to continue reading her columns....”
We each have to follow the dictates of our own conscience. Notice though, how few responded to this post quoting Ms. Coulter. She doesn’t generate much interest among conservatives anymore. It is a shame because she is a witty writer, but she has to face the consequences of ill advised positions on critical issues and on who she publically backs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.