Posted on 10/08/2011 8:35:24 AM PDT by Kaslin
Conservatives and liberals clash frequently on a wide array of issues, from taxes to trade, from deficits to defense. But their greatest conflict may lie in their contrasting attitudes toward civil society.
Conservatives regard the institutions of civil society -- families, churches and communities -- as sources of hope and renewal. Self-styled "progressives" see these institutions as seedbeds of prejudice and ignorance.
Conservatives believe that poverty stems largely from a lack of spiritual resources, resources that are typically transmitted through private, voluntary groups. Progressives view poverty as a simple lack of resources.
Conservatives believe that social justice is best pursued through the restoration of community, familial love, self-respect and responsibility -- all products of a robust civil society. Progressives believe that social justice requires that we redistribute material wealth.
Consider, too, how both groups react to the Tea Party movement.
For conservatives, this movement is a classic example of civil society in action: Ordinary Americans, appalled by the sudden, massive expansion of Big Government, and by the equally sudden, explosive growth of the national debt, have spontaneously organized into associations demanding change.
The great French author Alexis de Tocqueville would surely applaud the Tea Party movement. He would see in it an example of how a vigorous civil society, by serving as a check on the centralizing ambitions of the state, is vital to the health and well-being of democracy.
But progressives support the centralizing ambitions of the state. Thus, they've attacked the Tea Party movement with a fury that might have reminded Tocqueville of the French Revolution's hatred of religion. Prominent progressives have denounced Tea Party members as "terrorists," "racists" and "Nazis" who deserve to be "taken out."
The depth of progressive hatred of the Tea Party movement is startling. But I suppose this is how the "ruling class" invariably reacts whenever the "lower orders" start acting uppity.
Make no mistake: although today's "ruling class" calls itself progressive, it is in fact profoundly reactionary.
By undermining civil society, strengthening the state, and even trying to pin a smiley face on Big Government by renaming it "the federal family," it is laying the groundwork for the democratic despotism that Tocqueville foresaw, and warned against in his landmark book, Democracy in America.
Progressive hostility to the Tea Party movement has reinforced my conviction that strengthening civil society is more urgent today than ever before. We Americans need to regain something of Tocqueville's sense of awe and wonder at the power, ingenuity and creativity of those vital institutions.
Several years ago, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told a Heritage Foundation audience how a vibrant civil society contributed to a more just society in the rural Georgia of his youth:
"When someone down the road fell upon hard times," Justice Thomas recalled, "or when sickness beset a family, or when a hurricane or fire destroyed or damaged someone's house, people instinctively helped in whatever way they could. Not helping was unthinkable."
We need to remember that we are not helpless, ignorant masses desperately clinging to our guns or religion, as President Obama once said on the campaign trail. Nor are we anxiously awaiting the arrival of a messiah-president to deliver us from what Tocqueville called "the trouble of thinking and the cares of living."
Rather, we are the American people. We remain strong and resourceful. And we must open our minds to the untapped potential of freedom, to the hidden strengths of civil society, and to the indomitable power of the American spirit.
A conservative will teach a man how to fish to feed his hungry family.
A liberal will come along, take his fish, and give it to someone else.
Good article. Thanks for posting it.
The author has already said that a significant segment of today's society (Progressives), and a significant segment of the Government (Progressives), reject all that.
The "strengths of civil society" have been severly weakened, and will likely collapse into something quite uncivil in order for one side to yield to the other.
“Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish; and you have fed him for a lifetime. Teach a man to sell fish and he eats steak.”—
2011: Refusing to fish, he'll elect a government to confiscate your catch for him.
“Each citizen would then be completely independent of all his fellow man, and absolutely dependent on the state.”-Rousseau, philosophical father of the French Revolution.
People also used to look out for all of the kids in their neighborhoods, and they had authority to "advise and correct", something that is sadly missing today.
My husband has told our girls the story of the time he and his friends were throwing rocks into the deep pits that had been dug on his street during the installation of new sewer pipes.
One of the ladies on the block stuck her head out of the door and yelled, "Hey you kids - get away from those ditches!" To which the youngest of his companions replied impulsively, "You're not my mom!!!!"
My hubby then describes the fear and panic that statement raised in the older boys. They knew they were in trouble, and there was not much they could do but head home and take their lumps.
The whole social climate is different now.
Years ago, adults could tell kids who were misbehaving in public to behave, or go over and physically stop them from actions such as this throwing of rocks.
Nowadays, any adult who says anything to a misbehaving child, or would touch another child not his own to stop misbehavior, can be sued. I believe that caring adults in the community are too intimidated and afraid of trying to confront misbehavior done by kids today. So you have all kinds of mischief, kids acting wild in shopping malls, you name it. Social pressures or intervening by other adults just doesn’t keep kids in line anymore.
I think we’ve all heard the story about how, in the old days, if you got in trouble at school, kids would be afraid of the additional punishment they would get at home for what happened in school. Nowadays, the story goes, the parents are outraged that the school would punish their little angels for anything, and the most extreme such parents then sue the school. And I think kids take all of this in, and realize that they will not be punished in any meaningful way for a lot of things that they do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.