Why the Party of the KKK Hates Herman Cain

It’s not Herman Cain’s comment that many African Americans are “brainwashed” against conservatism or his declaration that he “won’t stay on the Democrat plantation” that really infuriates liberals. It’s the presidential candidate’s very existence. Blacks aren’t supposed to be conservative.

And Herman Cain certainly isn’t supposed to be sitting atop the field of Republican presidential aspirants. But that’s where a new CBS News poll places the former pizza king, garnering, along with former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, the support of 17 percent of Republican primary voters. Cain’s gain is not sitting well among those with race on the brain.

“Herman Cain is probably well liked by some of the Republicans because it hides the racist elements of the Republican Party,” quipped comedienne Janeane Garofalo. “Herman Cain provides this great opportunity so you can say ‘Look, this is not a racist, anti-immigrant, anti-female, anti-gay movement. Look we have a black man.’” CNN’s Cornell Belcher actually called the African American presidential candidate “racist” and “bigoted.” Jesse Jackson described the former Godfather’s Pizza chief executive officer’s characterization of the relationship between African Americans and the Democratic Party “demeaning and insulting” to black voters.

The talking head really losing his head over Herman Cain is Roland Martin. The CNN pundit writes, “You would think that a black man born and raised in Georgia, who was a teenager during the civil rights movement, would understand the transition of African-Americans from voting overwhelmingly Republican to strongly supporting the Democratic Party.”

During the civil rights movement, every member of the Georgia congressional delegation was a Democrat and every member of the Georgia congressional delegation save one voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The only African Americans elected to Congress from Georgia prior to the civil rights movement were Republicans. When Republican Fletcher Thompson helped break the Democratic stranglehold on the state’s Washington delegation in 1966, he gave an African American a job in his local office. However pedestrian this sounds today, this had never happened in that district. Even as seemingly benign a symbol of the New South as Jimmy Carter won election as governor after his campaign peddled a photo of his opponent with black basketball players to rallying Klansmen and as governor visited the Confederados—descendants of American Southerners who emigrated to Brazil following the Civil War—in 1972.

Martin accuses Cain of being “historically ignorant.” But Martin could use a refresher course on American history.

The history of political racism in America is largely a history of the Democratic Party. President Woodrow Wilson introduced Jim Crow into the federal bureaucracy, segregating postal workers, treasury department employees, and those in other sections of the government. Of the nearly two dozen African Americans who served in Congress prior to World War II, just one had belonged to the Democratic Party. The proportion of Republicans voting for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was actually greater than the proportion of Democrats, a fact that didn’t escape Martin’s notice. “What’s interesting to note is the greatest threat to passage of the bill came from white Southern Democrats, known as Dixiecrats. Moderate Republicans played a crucial role in getting the Civil Rights Act passed,” he conceded. But even his attempt at candor seeks to conceal more than reveal: more than four in five congressional Republicans—more than just moderates—voted for the legislation, and calling Democrats “Dixiecrats” doesn’t mean they’re not Democrats.

Even membership in the most vile racist organization was no impediment to leadership in the Democratic Party. In 1924, the Democratic National Convention refused to repudiate the Ku Klux Klan in an infamous vote. Thirteen years later, the party’s patron saint, Franklin Roosevelt, appointed a former Klansman, Hugo Black, to the U.S. Supreme Court. Before Robert Byrd won election to Congress in 1952, he unanimously won election as Exalted Cyclops in his local Ku Klux Klan chapter. That the leader in a fringe group could become among Democrats a decidedly non-fringe player—Byrd served longer in Congress than any other member and led Senate Democrats from 1977 to 1989—shows how seamlessly professional racists transitioned to professional politicians.

There were certainly Democrats who played heroic roles in establishing equality under the law for black Americans. Harry Truman ordering the integration of the armed forces and Hubert Humphrey pushing his party toward civil rights are two of many examples. But the villains of this chapter in American history are almost exclusively Democrats, too. Bull Connor? Democrat. Theodore Bilbo? Democrat. John Rankin? Democrat.

Why would a young African American growing up in Jim Crow Georgia want to join the party that joined itself to that?

“If Republicans today are angry about a high level of animosity coming from black voters,” Roland Martin writes, “they need to blame their white forefathers who wanted to see the racial divide continue over their refusal to allow African-Americans to be full citizens of the United States.” But it’s Roland Martin, not Herman Cain, who belongs to the party of Roger Taney, Woodrow Wilson, and George Wallace.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

URL to article: http://frontpagemag.com/2011/10/05/why-the-party-of-the-kkk-hates-herman-cain/

====================

TP: Mr. Cain, you recently came under fire for your comments about the kind of people you would appoint to your cabinet. Would you be opposed to appointing an openly gay but qualified person to be in your cabinet?
CAIN: Nope, not at all. I wouldn’t have a problem with that at all. I just want people who are qualified, I want them to believe in the Constitution of the United States of America. So yep, I don’t have a problem with appointing an openly gay person. Because they’re not going to try to put sharia law in our laws.
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=gsihc&cp=20&gs_id=25&xhr=t&q=Open+homosexual+Cain

=====================

HERMAN: What happens now?

Scott Toomey: Well, now, uh, Ken Mehlman, R. Clarke Cooper, Meghan McCain, Mary Cheney and I wait until nightfall, and then leap out of the log cabin, taking The Party(tm) by surprise -- not only by surprise, but totally unarmed!

HERMAN: Who leaps out?

Scott Toomey: Uh, Ken Mehlman, R. Clarke Cooper, Meghan McCain, Mary Cheney and I. Uh, leap out of the log cabin, uh and uh....

HERMAN: Oh....

Scott Toomey: Oh.... Um, l-look, if we built this large wooden Rhinocerous -- [twong]

ALL: Run away! Run away! Run away! Run away! [splat]

The response to this argument that you get from liberals is that all of their racists left the Democrat party in the 1980's and became Republicans. People like Robert Byrd are anachronisms.

I think that the whole "racism" issue has become predictable, boring and irrelevant. There is no institutionalized racism in America today. There may be isolated and pathological individual cases, but such people do not set national policy. Therefore, the argument over racism is irrelevant in national political terms. It's simply become a smear. And should be ignored accordingly.

Using Leftist Agit-Prop logic:

The racist Republicans only favor Cain, because it allows them to appear non-racist. So, they aren't just racists, they are lying racists.

Give up trying to use facts to change the mind of people who don't really believe the words coming out of their own mouths.

Dems don't call us racists because they believe it. They call us racist to keep their voter slaves terrified of what lies beyond the plantation walls.

Of course the liberals though never explain why it is that they still hold onto the same old racist progressive ideology though. It was the Progressive movement that revitalized the KKK after the republicans had nearly destroyed it. It was the progressive ideology that held racist platforms such as eugenics (abortion), separation of church and state and moral relativism. Abortion was started by the racist Margaret Sanger (known to speak in front of the KKK) who promoted eugenics as a means to control the spread of certain races. Abortion also was a policy started by Sanger and that largely targets black babies. Progressive abortion policies have resulted in a genocide of black human beings. The KKK of old would be proud of the democrats and the progressive movement today. Separation of church and state started with democrats boycotting religious ceremonies at the Capital because republicans were inviting black Americans. Later this was enshrined into Constitutional law by the progressive movement and a KKK lawyer on the Supreme Court (appointed by progressive democrat party icon FDR) thus also enshrining the democrat parties bigotry against Catholics as well (still seen today in the progressive movement’s bigotry against Catholics and Evangicals, coincidence? )

So how is it that the democrats still today share so much in common with the democrats of the KKK? Same progressive ideology. Same bigoted policies. Even the same hatred for certain religious groups as the KKK had.

And of course not only was KKK Byrd a democrat but he is to this day still the most internally promoted democrat in history. More internal party promotions than any other democrat. That is a fact. He was called the ‘conscience of the Senate’ by his fellow progressive democrats and called a great Constitutionalist.

Using Leftist Agit-Prop logic:

The racist Republicans only favor Cain, because it allows them to appear non-racist. So, they aren't just racists, they are lying racists.

I plan to help Herman anyway I can to get him elected president.

I wonder what that would make me?? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Among other reasons, I support Cain because he is the rat's worst nightmare. Not only is he the philosophical opposite of Obama, he defuses all of their race based screeching.

Also, the electorate is ready for an essentially non-politician to be President. His resume is perfect for the highest office, extensive executive experience which focused on returning companies to profitability.

Rather than nominate an establishment Republican in FL by the name of Bill McCollum of Clinton impeachment fame for the governorship, we elected a CEO, Rick Scott in 2010. He is doing great and is proof that executive experience rather than political experience is what matters.

Cain is a twofer, an experienced executive and an establishment outsider.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.