About time really.
1 posted on
10/04/2011 9:49:27 AM PDT by
sunmars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: sunmars
sit back and watch the heads explode, popcorn anyone?
2 posted on
10/04/2011 9:50:56 AM PDT by
sunmars
To: sunmars
3 posted on
10/04/2011 9:51:21 AM PDT by
bcsco
(A vote for Cain will cure the Pain!)
To: sunmars
To: vette6387; MetaThought; 60Gunner; XHogPilot; FreedomPoster; Josephat; Prince of Space; ...
Faster and Furiouser Ping.
5 posted on
10/04/2011 9:51:56 AM PDT by
MestaMachine
(obama kills)
To: sunmars
House Republicans are going to call for a special counsel to determine whether Attorney General Holder perjured himself during his testimony to the House Judiciary Committee on Operation Fast and Furious That's a pretty limited mandate.
Who's investigating the whole enchilada?
7 posted on
10/04/2011 9:53:16 AM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: sunmars
8 posted on
10/04/2011 9:53:39 AM PDT by
Doogle
((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: sunmars
Yes! Contact Mr. Issa and thank him for the work he’s done so far, and offer encouragement to stay the course.
10 posted on
10/04/2011 9:54:00 AM PDT by
cblue55
(It's either America, or Obama. It cannot be both!)
To: sunmars
(*Cue ‘Imperial March’ background music here*)
To: sunmars
Wouldn't Holder have to approve of this operation from the beginning, since he is the attorney general that has authority over the government legal matters? And since he knows about the operation, wouldn't he have to get obamma’s approval, since he reports to obamma? So obamma would have known about it from the beginning?
Are they going to say this was a rogue matter, outside of their oversight?
12 posted on
10/04/2011 9:54:51 AM PDT by
rawhide
To: sunmars
Finally.
Borrow some spine, if you have to, GOP.
18 posted on
10/04/2011 9:56:19 AM PDT by
Jane Long
(Soli Deo Gloria!)
To: sunmars
Wow. The gigs up.
Of course, you won't hear a WORD of this in the press, but guess what?
It doesn't matter. Holder's still going to be removed.
19 posted on
10/04/2011 9:57:24 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
("Lazamataz" is a four-letter word.)
To: sunmars
It should happen but I’ll believe it when I see it.
20 posted on
10/04/2011 9:58:00 AM PDT by
mk2000
To: sunmars
Nope. Pharaoh do not respond to demands from mere congress people.
21 posted on
10/04/2011 9:58:14 AM PDT by
ichabod1
(Nuts; A house divided against itself cannot stand.)
To: sunmars
and the fat lady has indeed taken the stage....she has opened her mouth, and the singing is about to begin....holder, napolitano, clinton, and finally fubo himself...........the commies are going away...now, if we can just get the house judiciary committee to start impeaching judges, we could wipe out almost the entire commie nest
23 posted on
10/04/2011 9:58:29 AM PDT by
joe fonebone
(Project Gunwalker, this will make watergate look like the warm up band......)
To: sunmars
Good news. I would love to see Holder completely destroyed. Same with Obama.
25 posted on
10/04/2011 9:59:12 AM PDT by
Gator113
(Palin 2012, period.....)
To: sunmars
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, is sending a letter to President Obama arguing that Holder cannot investigate himself and will request a probe by a special counsel
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And what happens should Ovomit deny this request for special council ?
Can the House Judiciary Committee go ahead anyway even tho pukeface denies it ?
27 posted on
10/04/2011 9:59:29 AM PDT by
simplesimon
(Thomas Paine is weeping. Common sense is gone.)
To: sunmars
saying he didn't understand the question rather than he didn't know of the program is not a successful defense to perjury. Exactly right. If Holder was confused, he could have asked for clarification-rephrasing. Holder, of all people, should know better than to definitively answer a question he did not understand.
28 posted on
10/04/2011 9:59:29 AM PDT by
randita
(Obama - chains you can bereave in.)
To: sunmars
If Holder didn’t understand the question, did he ask for clarification?
34 posted on
10/04/2011 10:00:59 AM PDT by
Fresh Wind
('People have got to know whether or not their President is a crook.' Richard M. Nixon)
To: sunmars
“Committee Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, is sending a letter to President Obama arguing that Holder cannot investigate himself and will request a probe by a special counsel.”
Lamar Smith must still think Obama an ethical and principled human being.
Obama will look at the letter then pass it to
the rest of his politburo for the days laugh. It’s going to
take a party with a spine. Republicans just don’t have one
right now. Baynerd is proof of that.
35 posted on
10/04/2011 10:01:17 AM PDT by
Slambat
(The right to keep and bear arms. Anything one man can carry, drive or pull.)
To: sunmars
Isn’t this just about where we could start counting down the beginning of the end for Richard Nixon and Watergate?
The parallels are astonishing. Except that in the instance of Watergate, nobody died as a direct result of the operation gone wrong.
39 posted on
10/04/2011 10:02:17 AM PDT by
alloysteel
(Are Democrats truly "better angels"? They are lousy stewards for America.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
