To: bruinbirdman
>> An opposition boycott or any perception that the contest has been unfair could easily tip the country back into violence, observers say.
“Inspiring.” (not my words)
2 posted on
10/01/2011 12:54:31 AM PDT by
Gene Eric
(Your Hope has been Redistributed. Here's your damn Change!)
To: bruinbirdman
Is this “Supreme Guide” the Kleagle of Muslim Brotherhod?
3 posted on
10/01/2011 2:02:38 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page) [rednecks come in many colors])
To: bruinbirdman
No surprise here - the same folks the WH and its cronies said would not be a threat, and would be an asset to democracy, are opposing democracy. Who’d a thunk?
4 posted on
10/01/2011 4:58:33 AM PDT by
trebb
("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
To: bruinbirdman
An opposition boycott could lead to violence? What?
Isn't that like saying if The RATS boycotted next years elections, THAT would lead to violence? How does this compute?
Now, if The Bruthahhood decided to CANCEL elections like Gov. Sally Perdue is suggesting....
5 posted on
10/01/2011 5:01:03 AM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: bruinbirdman
A boycott by the Muslim Brotherhood? What’s not to like?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson