Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/28/2011 3:14:40 PM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson; kristinn

Cue Nelson Muntz...


2 posted on 09/28/2011 3:16:42 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

I am glad they are getting their butts handed to them, but, it is too bad for the people who have settled already. They can’t back out of their agreements.


3 posted on 09/28/2011 3:42:56 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
Doggone, somebody finally turned to that TSA picture showing an agent on the job patting down somebody inside a government owned facility.

Without a RELEASE from TSA and the agent and the private individual this picture had no copyright valid for commercial use.

Obviously the Righthaven operation put that picture into play as a commercial venture.

End of story.

It's a bit more complex in the way the lawyers handled it, but Righthaven not only didn't have a valid copyright, the people they purchaed the rights from didn't have a valid copyright either, and that individual being patted down is probably owed damages for the failure to get his release.

Just like to remind folks that I made predictions about which way Righthaven cases were going the second I saw that photo!

Those predictions jsut came true.

4 posted on 09/28/2011 3:53:32 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson