Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lowbridge

No problem.

I’ll just use cash.

I may have to pay a higher one-time fee, but if the banks would prefer the costs of having to transport, store, and use cash, it’s fine by me.


5 posted on 09/21/2011 2:42:26 PM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jonty30

And the old fashioned bank check has hardly gone away. The writer of the check pays a minimal amount to purchase the checkbook, and usually banks honor checks from checkbooks printed by third parties. The business or entity accepting the check pays nothing for depositing the check (though of course it undertakes the risk that the check may fail to clear).


7 posted on 09/21/2011 2:48:53 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page) [rednecks come in many colors])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30

It’s fine by me also.

About a year ago I went into my bank (a small rural bank) and withdrew a sizable amount in $100 bills. I cleaned them out of hundred dollar bills. The money was in a checking account which paid no interest. I will do that again if they start charging a fee so I can use my own money, and I’ll tell them why. They don’t own it. I do.


19 posted on 10/02/2011 5:51:16 AM PDT by chainsaw (I'd hate to be a democrat running against Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson