Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo

Since I am not running for office, I can say that I DO advocate substantial cuts in Social Security for current recipients. Collectively they have voted in the most elections, and they are more responsible than anyone. If they did not realize that they were participating in a Ponzi scheme, it’s their own fault for not paying attention.

As a practical matter, it may be necessary to exempt current recipients, but there isn’t a moral case for doing so.


5 posted on 09/19/2011 2:47:18 PM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: reaganaut1

Sure because 100% of them voted for the wrong person! Do you actually think before you type?


7 posted on 09/19/2011 2:56:42 PM PDT by brytlea (Wake me when it's over...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Economically the best thing we could do right now is simply end Social Security. I say that as a current recipient with no other sort of pension. I wouldn’t like it but I would get by. Alternatively and a little more palatably to the generally less economically educated people and the short sighted ones I say cut off from the system in one action everyone who has not yet reached his 50th birthday. Set up something like the Peruvian system then.


21 posted on 09/19/2011 3:48:44 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "ERomney cannot get enough socialist leaning "independents" conomics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson