My original post was responding to a comment made by Shaka who was responding to org.whodat. Org.whodat said that Perry “was all hat and no cattle.” Shaka responded with “Man, you’re on every Perry thread started and just keep being negative.” Shaka then asked “Who would you vote for President?” That question struck a nerve with me and that prompted my post:
“Don’t even try asking these clowns who they want for president. I have been asking them for a year, and they always say, “It’s too early to tell.” That line must be in the script too. They make me sick! It’s best to tell them to run back to the DU hell they have come from.”
With your phony excuse that “I will pick a candidate when I am ready, not before,” is nothing but dodging the question. You do not want your bias to be identified. And it follows a pattern that I have been seeing for over a year. I do not accept your lame excuse!
Org.whodat responded with a reference to the tuition situation with children of illegals in Texas. It was obnoxious and typical of the mindless script being thrown out like puke on here. And, of course, there was no answer to who he preferred for the Republican nominee. The script is followed just like you. Other Freepers responded to him with comments about “crickets” and questions about who he supports.
As for the idea that Governor Rick Perry is all hat and no cattle, that is an example of mindless parrots who throw out their anti-Palin and anti-Perry screeds without knowing what they are writing about. Perry has worn the rancher’s hat, growing up on a working Texas ranch with cattle and cotton. I won’t bore you people with the details because once you get the facts, like org.whodat, you run over them like a Mac truck and go off to forget them like you never read one sentence.
I gave this detailed account to show you that you have certainly failed to follow what was going on with this thread because of clowns like org.whodat.
OK, tell him you resent his alleged spamming. That would be quite understandable.
Shaka then asked “Who would you vote for President?”
Ok, I went back and looked. What he really posted was, "Did he bang your ex-wife or somethin’? Man,you got a hard on for him. Who would you vote for President?"
So that profound post inspired you to repeat the same lame approach: "Don’t even try asking these clowns who they want for president. I have been asking them for a year, and they always say, 'It’s too early to tell.'"
Let's see if I understand you: In your universe, those who don't favor a candidate yet are sinister agents of some mysterious deception; they could not want simply to study the candidates before deciding? Hell, Perry just entered the race. I may vote for Perry eventually, but demanding others to pick a candidate is just mindless, and does not reflect well on your candidate, although some Palin supporters are at least as abrasive as you guys.
With your phony excuse that “I will pick a candidate when I am ready, not before,” is nothing but dodging the question. You do not want your bias to be identified. And it follows a pattern that I have been seeing for over a year. I do not accept your lame excuse!
That's an amazing rant that makes no sense except to the delusional. I don't need an excuse for not deciding until I know the facts, skippy.