OK, tell him you resent his alleged spamming. That would be quite understandable.
Shaka then asked Who would you vote for President?
Ok, I went back and looked. What he really posted was, "Did he bang your ex-wife or somethin? Man,you got a hard on for him. Who would you vote for President?"
So that profound post inspired you to repeat the same lame approach: "Dont even try asking these clowns who they want for president. I have been asking them for a year, and they always say, 'Its too early to tell.'"
Let's see if I understand you: In your universe, those who don't favor a candidate yet are sinister agents of some mysterious deception; they could not want simply to study the candidates before deciding? Hell, Perry just entered the race. I may vote for Perry eventually, but demanding others to pick a candidate is just mindless, and does not reflect well on your candidate, although some Palin supporters are at least as abrasive as you guys.
With your phony excuse that I will pick a candidate when I am ready, not before, is nothing but dodging the question. You do not want your bias to be identified. And it follows a pattern that I have been seeing for over a year. I do not accept your lame excuse!
That's an amazing rant that makes no sense except to the delusional. I don't need an excuse for not deciding until I know the facts, skippy.
Here is this for you studies: Seventeen (17) things that critics are saying about Rick Perry
http://texasfred.net/archives/11589
Good reading!