Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin Goes Native
Red State ^ | 8-19-11 | Leon Wolf

Posted on 08/19/2011 11:48:35 AM PDT by Brookhaven

I am not a Sarah Palin hater. As an Alaska native, I have some appreciation for the political skill needed to knock off Frank Murkowski and Tony Knowles in the same election – political skill that simply isn’t possessed by idiots. And I’ve watched with admiration as she has continually kept herself in the news while shaping the national conversation in subtle (and sometimes not-so-subtle) ways. But over the last several months, Palin’s unique brand of activism seems to have shifted – whether consciously or unconsciously – towards the will of the Republican Establishment.

Consider: Palin’s first break with grassroots/TEA Party orthodoxy came during the 2010 elections, when she endorsed establishment candidates Carly Fiorina and Kelly Ayotte over more conservative challengers Chuck Devore and Ovide Lamontagne. These moves were defended by Palin’s legion of loyalists as “smart political choices,” the reasoning being that Fiorina and Ayotte were the most conservative candidates who stood a reasonable chance of winning the general election. However, whatever the merit of this defense, it certainly did not apply consistently to Palin’s endorsements in 2010, as she nearly simultaneously endorsed the quixotic and doomed candidacy of Christine O’Donnell over Mike Castle in Delaware.

In 2011, Palin’s actions have trended more towards the wishes of the establishment. Palin has made absolutely no moves that are consistent with a candidate that is actually preparing to run for the presidency that I am aware of. She has hired no field staff, has put no organization on the ground in IA, NH, or SC, has not met with the big ticket donors that could kick off a campaign (especially relevant since Palin doesn’t have a large cache of personal wealth to draw from), and hasn’t to my knowledge had meetings with any of the state and county-level power brokers in these states to discuss their willingness to help her potential candidacy. All of the evidence thus far points inescapably to the conclusion that Sarah Palin is not running for President – or that if she is running for President, she does not intend to run the sort of campaign that is actually designed to win the nomination. And yet, she patently refuses to give an unequivocal answer as to whether she will run or not, leaving her most dedicated supporters in a position that they do not feel comfortable openly joining and volunteering for another Presidential campaign.

The end result of this equivocation is that a number of insurgent outsider campaigns (probably most notably Michele Bachmann’s) have been running without the full strength of TEA Party backing that they would otherwise enjoy if Palin had declared that she wasn’t running back in March. Her decision to upstage the insurgent campaigns of Bachmann, Paul and Pawlenty at the Ames poll by showing up and stoking the fires of speculation regarding her candidacy yet further at what was supposed to be a big win for at least one “outsider” campaign was the greatest gift the Republican establishment could have hoped for. Ironically, if Sarah Palin does decide to run, she will ultimately accomplish nothing other than completely sucking the wind out of almost all the non-Romney campaign operations on the ground.

In her latest pro-establishment move, Palin has issued a non-endorsement endorsement of Orrin Hatch in Utah. Palin’s comments on Hatch were characteristically canny, in that she refused to come out and officially endorse Hatch, which might alienate some of her base of support. However, at the same time it gives Hatch great press and shielding from the right, and signals pretty clearly that she will not be officially endorsing Chaffetz or any other TEA Party favorite in Utah.

In this instance, Palin doesn’t even have the excuse that she is endorsing the most conservative candidate that can win in the general; Utah is such a solidly Republican state that whoever wins the Republican nomination will be all but certain to win the general election. Palin’s deliberate shielding of Hatch serves no purpose but to ingratiate the Republican establishment who is terrified of the wave of conservative/TEA Party challengers in safe red states.

Because I believe that Sarah Palin is actually very politically savvy, I have to believe that she knows exactly what she is doing with these moves, and that their consequences are intended. It therefore saddens me to find that one of the party’s most effective outsider voices is now being used so effectively to serve undeserving insiders.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ayotte; christineodonnell; fiorina; hatch; orrinhatch; palin; sarahpalin; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
I'm not sure I have a flame retardant suit thick enough for this one, but I though it was an interesting perspective and worth discussing.
1 posted on 08/19/2011 11:48:41 AM PDT by Brookhaven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

I will never forgive Tokyo Rove for what he did to O’Donnell’s campaign.


2 posted on 08/19/2011 11:53:31 AM PDT by sauropod (ObaMao: Let them eat peas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

I think way too many enjoy their hobby of attempting to look into the mind of Sarah and determining exactly what her motives are. They suffer from obsession.


3 posted on 08/19/2011 11:54:56 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
-"I am not a Sarah Palin hater."

Oh, oh! I smell a ....

4 posted on 08/19/2011 11:55:05 AM PDT by The Bronze Titan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

I won’t flame you. This is par for the course.

You jerk. /sarc


5 posted on 08/19/2011 11:55:37 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

I have no facts or reason to disagree...but, oh how I hope she is not catering to the Party...they will just reach out and bite her...IN THE END...LOL


6 posted on 08/19/2011 11:55:52 AM PDT by 3D-JOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

No worth a discussion.


7 posted on 08/19/2011 11:57:07 AM PDT by RED SOUTH (If you liked George W. Bush, you will LOVE Rick Perry! Follow me on twitter @redsouth72)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

It’s stupid. It would take a long article to refute this, but I’ll just point out that Carly Fiorina was probably the most conservative candidate with a chance to be elected, but that Mike Castle was a corrupt, hard-left fake Republican who was worse than the Democrat.

And that Christine O’Donnell might possibly have won if she had not been constantly undermined by Karl Rove and the Republican establishment, as well as the Delaware Republican party. Plus an establishment hack who was working for her, who went public with that witchcraft ad that killed her, even though she told him NOT TO DO IT.

Just the same way that the hacks working for McCain undermined Palin and even their supposed boss. The corruption runs deep. At least Fiorina was an outsider with some chance of improving things.


8 posted on 08/19/2011 11:57:49 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
In her latest pro-establishment move, Palin has issued a non-endorsement endorsement of Orrin Hatch in Utah.

Mark Levin gave him a whole-hearted endorsement.

9 posted on 08/19/2011 11:58:12 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
Consider: Palin’s first break with grassroots/TEA Party orthodoxy came during the 2010 elections, when she endorsed establishment candidates Carly Fiorina and Kelly Ayotte over more conservative challengers Chuck Devore and Ovide Lamontagne.

Maybe she likes to endorse females. The mama grizzly syndrome.

10 posted on 08/19/2011 11:58:55 AM PDT by freespirited (Stupid people are ruining America. --Herman Cain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
towards the will of the Republican Establishment.

Kind of a stpuid argument considering Sarah Palin was the VP candidate to John McCain.

11 posted on 08/19/2011 12:01:02 PM PDT by douginthearmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Maybe she likes to endorse females. The mama grizzly syndrome.

Are you suggesting that identity politics are more important to Sarah than supporting the most conservative person in the race? Say it isn't so!

12 posted on 08/19/2011 12:01:09 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: The Bronze Titan

I was going to stop reading right there. I like Sarah but....she eats salmon and I hate fish so I cannot support her mentality going on here. They prefer peas and sharing them with others.


13 posted on 08/19/2011 12:02:07 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

IIRC Sarah never said she’d ONLY support ‘Tea Party Candidates’. I believe she said she’d support those who shared her common sense conservatism when she could, but would also put her support behind those who may not be as doctrinaire, but who shared her views in general, and who also could be elected.


14 posted on 08/19/2011 12:04:13 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
You are clearly mistaking her admonition that we should support "Hatch's call for balanced budget reform" for "support for Hatch." I believe that once she announces her candidacy (very shortly, within a month) she'll openly back Hatch's TEA Party opponent. Rebecca Mansour has actually hinted at this.

And I don't believe that any true supporter of Governor Palin's would misinterpret the TEA leaves on this as you just have. However, credit where it's due, you have come up with an original and truly sub-rosa way to attack her... much to the delight, I am sure, of the same GOP Establishment you purport to openly denigrate.

How very odd, eh?

Apparently Sarah Palin isn't the only clever Alaskan trying to shape this race.

;^\

15 posted on 08/19/2011 12:04:30 PM PDT by Gargantua ("Palin is announcing on September 3rd in Indianola, Iowa")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

“I am not a Sarah Palin hater. As an Alaska native” classic fist words of a “Concern Troll”!


16 posted on 08/19/2011 12:04:34 PM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

There will be a fine line to walk should she announce that she is running. Carefully positioning herself to cause the establishment to not completely dismiss or demean her yet maintain the enthusiastic support of all of the TEA folks. By giving someone like Hatch feigned support she disarms the GOP hacks and causes the moderates to “take a look”.


17 posted on 08/19/2011 12:04:58 PM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

“...but I though it was an interesting perspective and worth discussing.”

There was so much spin and just plain misinformation in it, that it isn’t even worth discussing.


18 posted on 08/19/2011 12:05:30 PM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
If you like to read 'recycled garbage' then feast yourself with these 'highly politically astute' observations (in light of the claim that she's gone "establishment")...

- "Palin has made absolutely no moves that are consistent with a candidate that is actually preparing to run for the presidency"

-"She has hired no field staff, has put no organization on the ground in IA, NH, or SC, has not met with the big ticket donors that could kick off a campaign"

-"and hasn’t had meetings with any of the state and county-level power brokers in these states to discuss their willingness to help her potential candidacy."

- "All of the evidence thus far points inescapably to the conclusion that Sarah Palin is not running for President"

Evidently, he's begging you to 'smoke' that stuff he's been smoking!

19 posted on 08/19/2011 12:05:57 PM PDT by The Bronze Titan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RED SOUTH

Yes it is.


20 posted on 08/19/2011 12:08:07 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson