Posted on 08/19/2011 7:51:47 AM PDT by Kaslin
Washington: Who on Aug. 18, 2010 -- almost one year ago -- said, "I now think it is clear even to official Washington that President Obama is the worst president of modern times. President Jimmy Carter is redeemed"? Yes, it was I. And I threw the entire weight of The American Spectator behind that asseveration, putting both Jimmy and Barry on the cover.
Now, of course, others are stepping forward and drawing the awkward comparison. On the left, there is Maureen Dowd in The New York Times quoting an anonymous Democratic senator who laments that "we are watching him turn into Jimmy Carter right before our eyes." Apparently, the left-wing fussbudget Eric Alterman made the same comparison in U.S. News and World Report.
Yet I went further, making the point that between Barry and Jimmy, Barry is worse. Consider the prophet's performance on TV during this financial crisis. He is actually calling for more spending, and the markets continue to tumble. His fabled cool is exposed. It is obliviousness.
Columnists William McGurn and Bret Stephens made similar comparisons on the same day, Aug. 8, 2011, and in the same newspaper, the Wall Street Journal. Stephens is bold: "I just think the president is not very bright." He quotes Socrates, Aristotle, and Plutarch respectively on wisdom, prudence and the costs of flattery. McGurn has an eye to history. He reminds us of the extravagant statements made about Carter's genius over thirty years ago by New York Times columnists Tom Wicker, Anthony Lewis, R. W. Apple and the author Norman Mailer in The New York Times Magazine. It really is astonishing how these oafs fell for a liberal Democrat's claim to high intelligence even as they dismissed a conservative Republican as simple-minded while he ended the Cold War and set the American economy on course for the longest period of growth in modern history. I have in mind Ronald Reagan.
Stephens quotes President Obama as saying to an aide in 2008, "I know more about policies on any particular issue than my policy directors. And I'll tell you right now that I'm ... a better political director than my political director." Stephans excuses Obama's vanity as but an echo of the balderdash said about him by his admirers. I know what he means. There is the "presidential historian" Michael Beschloss telling radio host Don Imus that Obama "is a guy whose IQ is off the charts...." Asked for evidence, Beschloss confides, "he's probably the smartest guy ever to become president." And, of course, a media "presidential historian" would know.
My favorite panegyric to Obama comes from The New York Times columnist David Brooks, recalling his first interview with then-Sen. Obama. "I don't want to sound like I'm bragging," says Brooks, "but usually when I talk to senators, while they may know a policy area better than me, they generally don't know political philosophy better than me. I got the sense that he knew both better than me." Brooks went on to make this invaluable observation, "I remember distinctly an image -- we were sitting on his couches, and I was looking at his pant leg and his perfectly creased pant, and I'm thinking, (a) he's going to be president and (b) he'll be a very good president." What would this precious Washington insider have reported if Sen. Obama had been wearing pantyhose?
For more than thirty years a wounded Jimmy Carter has roamed the world speaking ill of whomever the sitting president might be and occasionally making it difficult for that president to make policy. Obama has already surpassed him, speaking ill of America as a whole while being president. In Strasbourg, France, on April 3, 2009, he said, "Instead of celebrating our dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive." What he will do in retirement one can only imagine. But until his retirement, enjoy the show.
I understand now why all the liberals thought Obama was so smart.
The reason is that he is smarter than all the other liberals, but that’s not saying much — at least when it comes to policy making, understanding economics, understanding the Constitution and knowing about American history.
Carter became just another liberal after he left office, spouting anti-Israel, pro-islamic pablum. As long as he was hammering nails, nobody really cared what he said on policy because he was totally irrelevant in that arena.
I predict Obama will be so bitter, that it will affect his post-Presidency popularity. He will be relegated to giving speeches to islamics in caves.
The Grand Experiment with electing an affirmative-action president is proving to be a disaster that no one can ignore.
I don’t think he’s stupid. I think he is evil. I think his goal is to cause a collpase of the current economic system in America and create a new socialist state.
I think everything he does points in that direction. He and his handlers view the Great Depression and Socialist FDR’s policies as his guiding light.
Now I got to drain and clean the coffee out of my keyboard.
Maybe our president's brain is congested with so much knowledge that he can't get out it of his head, therefore he keeps voting "present".
“Brooks went on to make this invaluable observation, “I remember distinctly an image — we were sitting on his couches, and I was looking at his pant leg and his perfectly creased pant, and I’m thinking, (a) he’s going to be president and (b) he’ll be a very good president.”
Brooks seems to have committed “Lust in his heart” thinking about Obama. Just like Jimmah Carter.
I think of these post-presidential speaking tours as payback tours. I mean, what can they say that hasn't already been said, yet they make six figures a pop. And Obama? He can't speak in anything but empty platitudes, but watch him rake it in, bigtime.
Post of the Week !
Being “smart” is way over rated by liberals. It’s as through nothing else matters. They told us Clinton was “smart” and what did he accomplish in 8 years? They touted Obama’s “brilliance” and he is breaking the country financially if not literally. He is failing in every sphere. Notice liberals don’t praise other qualities such as courage, wisdom, deciveness, executive skills, crisis management, etc.
Something must be happening in LibLand. My high school sweet heart and I have been friends now for over 50 years, she a died in the wool lib, Obama no wrong. This morning while chatting she just dropped a, “I am so disappointed in Obama, he just doesn’t seem to have a clue as to what to do.” She then went on to complain that her 401K is tanking and said it has to be Obama’s policies as he has been in office for over two years. Had to get another cup of coffee.
You would think "Presidential Historian" Beschloss might have heard of Thomas Jefferson or Theodore Roosevelt but I guess not. TR authored over 35 books. When it comes to O-Bambi, all we have are two ghost-written bio-fictions. Given the lock on his school records, we don't even know if he ever completed a term paper.
I’m with you- I dont think Obama is as stupid as he seems to be.
If he was just incompetant that would be one thing...
But he is a lying muslim communist traitor.
It is his INTENTION to implement socialism and Islam in America.
He is just not saying so because he would be out on his ass tomorrow.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.