Why? Because she didn't author more F'ing bills controlling our lives?
Do you support this approach?
I don’t agree. Her scant legislative record shows she’s not effective at all.
It’s ceased to be about being effective, it’s become imperative for the nation that we elect people that know right from wrong and will do right. Every time. Because it’s right.
This is what’s demanded from one’s oath of office and to live free under our U.S. Constitution.
She’s pretty much where most House members are in their first few terms. Only a few get into lower rung leadership positions or author bills. My lack of support for her candidacy has to do with her lack of executive leadership experience.
That has nothing to do with her campaign skills and demonstrable competence on the issues. She has been much stronger than I would have ever imagined.
Why? Because she didn't author more F'ing bills controlling our lives?
Do you support this approach?