Posted on 08/11/2011 7:01:13 AM PDT by Kaslin
Wall Street analyst Meredith Whitney has ventured into an area she should have avoided -- political analysis. The results were not pretty.
Deprived of the hike in revenue they so desired from the recent debt-ceiling legislation, the nation's left-of-center political wing now is intent on getting their hands on more taxes from "the rich." Expect them to increasingly use class warfare rhetoric and degradation of the tea party as a means to reach their goal.
A long parade of Democrats hit the talk shows after the downgrade of the nation's debt by Standard and Poor's, calling the adjustment a "tea party downgrade" and calling for new revenue by taxing "wealthy Americans."
Then came comments from respected Wall Street analyst Meredith Whitney. In an interview, she reportedly described the tea party as primarily "freaked out white men who are unemployed."
Wow, that's a new one. And with that comment, Whitney appeared about as in touch with reality as many of her fellow graduates of Brown University. In the rarified air in which Whitney operates, it would be easy to dismiss the opinions of others who won't be spending time at Martha's Vineyard with President Obama. You know, the malcontented unwashed masses, a "fringe" element, as she put it.
But wait a minute. This same Meredith Whitney has been attacked by Democrats for being too critical of their policies. She is the same person who is married to a contributor to Fox Business News. And she's the same person who, after botching her description of the tea party, made a very tea party-esque statement in the same interview. She said that "to push for the extension of unemployment benefits ... should unleash absolute backlash against the (Obama) administration."
Perhaps Meredith should examine the relevant polling data. It suggests that a fairly large percent of both independents and Republicans identify with the tea party and its policies.
As I keep noting, the tea party is more a state of mind than it is something one officially signs up with. Maybe this well-heeled Wall Street analyst should consider which group is larger: those who agree with the general concept of smaller government, or those who live in the safe bubble of high finance on Wall Street.
Along with attacks on the "fringe" tea party, there is an equally strong movement to drive a wedge between "middle class" America and "the rich." Obama relentlessly pushes for new taxes on "wealthy" Americans and counts himself among this privileged class that should spread the wealth. CNN recently touted a poll that did indeed show a majority of Americans wanting to see increased taxes on higher-income Americans and businesses.
But this rub remains for those who keep calling for a redistribution of wealth from those who have to those who have less: They can't seem to define precisely who is wealthy and who isn't, just as Whitney can't seem to tell us exactly who is aligned with the tea party. As a result, there is no true benchmark for wealth other than the artificially and often-quoted magic amount of $250,000 of yearly income.
Ironically, many of those who have truly great wealth are also those most willing to say "tax the rich." Of course, as I and many others have pointed out, most of these folks have their finances so well-protected that any incremental increase in taxes would have no real impact on their daily lives or their personal wealth.
The real goal of class envy is to make all but a privileged few the true "wealthy" in this country and to shove families that might appear wealthy -- those making $250,000 a year in income but who don't feel too wealthy -- right on down into a growing middle class that is quickly becoming a growing "sinking class."
Whitney was way off base in her description of the size and makeup of the tea party (whose actual founders were women). And Democratic leaders are equally off base in continually wanting to balance their budgets on the backs of people they call rich, but who really don't meet the true modern-day definition of the term.
But those who agree with the tea party's core beliefs shouldn't be too upset with the somewhat insulated Whitney. She may think tea party types are "older white men," but her opposition to another round of extended unemployment benefits makes her a perfect candidate for membership in the selfsame tea party.
Come on, Whitney, your doublewide trailer, your pickup truck, your chewing tobacco and your two free tickets to the next Sarah Palin event are all waiting for you.
I kind of made this point yesterday in another thread and got ripped for it . . .
Meredith Whitney is a really bad Wall Street analyst who made a call that municipal bonds would be defaulted. None have. I think that criticism from whatshisname sailed over everybody’s head.
A really bad analyst? The FIRST ananlyst to correctly call the banking debacle in 2007? Everyone in this industry gets one wrong now and then. What about the city in Rhode Island that declared bankruptcy last week?
As a money manager myself who buys a lot of municipals for clients there are DEFINITELY issuers I am avoiding because I have real fear of default.
And how many elitists are big fans of pro wrestling like she is?
Whoa there a minute. Her muni predictions are much closer to reality now then before. She doesn't have near as many detractors now than 6 months ago.
How can you say that they are bad predictions with things spiraling downwards?
She will probably be correct unfortunately.
But that is a totally separate issue from her stupid comments yesterday.
As Rick said to her; “stick with munis”. Rick was telling her to stay out of political commentary I think.
The point is that she may be intelligent on the subject of finance, but she’s an idiot in other arenas.
Huh? She is? Well that's news. /sarc
As Rick said to her; “stick with munis”. Rick was telling her to stay out of political commentary I think.
Rick said “how many have defaulted?” It was clearly a jab.
If anything, I became even more firmly convinced that Forbes would have been a two-term President of the United States by now if television didn't exist as a campaign medium and all campaign advertising was done through radio and print media.
who is her husband?
John Bradfield Layfield, formerly known as JBL when he wrestled with the WWE.
Sorry, Bradshaw not Bradfield
Why is she considered intelligent about Finance? What’s the real evidence of that intelligence?
I must admit, that I used to have a LOT of views about southern conservatives that were off base. I mean, I agreed with them politically, but thought they were weird in many ways. Now that I have known quite a few, they are some of my favorite people. I still don't like the gap-toothed mouth breathers though...
Check previous post...”may be”
Why is she considered intelligent about Finance? What’s the real evidence of that intelligence?
Because unlike so many, she is PAID BIG MONEY by Institutions for her research and opinions/recommendations. She also manages a LOT of MONEY for those institutions.
Of course you will probably call them stupid too . . .
That ONLY happens when someone has consistently helped their clients MAKE MONEY.
Pretty simple concept actually . . .
Great logic there Meredith.
The unemployed don't pay taxes so why would "they" waste energy with the Tea Party who are working to get taxes lowered?
That’s a friggin feint. Who, what, where, when, how ... all missing, LRoggy. Back it up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.