Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Among the Tax-takers (getting tattoos on their backsides)
American Thinker ^ | Earl Wright

Posted on 07/25/2011 6:58:30 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

....I can't talk specifics about my time at the IRS, but here are some generalities. Those claiming EITC also qualify for other so-called refundable credits (how can something be refundable when nothing is paid in the first place?). The typical 1040 would show an income of between $12,000 to $18,000 for the year. It was usually accompanied by one W-2 with the income earned almost always by a female. With other refundable credits listed, a "refund" would be claimed of between $6,000 and $9,000.

And these people believe that is their money; they have a right to it. I fielded a telephone query from a woman who didn't even say hello, but blurted, "I haven't got my taxes." For an instant I thought she meant that she didn't have enough money to pay her taxes, but I quickly realized she was talking about her "refund." We newbies learned that those who pay taxes have a general fear of calling the IRS and tend to be nice on the telephone, while those who don't pay any taxes believe they are entitled and are not always pleasant to deal with. We also learned these aren't the brightest people on the planet with many signing their refund over to a tax-preparer and then claiming they didn't know they had done that. (The "instant refund" scam perpetrated by many storefront tax-preparers is a whole other story.)

...A golfing buddy said his girlfriend's daughter claims EITC among other things and received a U.S. government check for $6,000. She used the money to take her toddler daughter and the child's ne'er-do-well father to the Monterey Bay Aquarium -- a couple hundred bucks -- and spent the remainder for a giant tattoo on her back. I'm so glad I could help....

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: eic; irs; poor; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
Is Your IRA Going To Be Raided? "The notion of government raiding personal retirement accounts for funds may seem extreme. Perhaps it shouldn't. Other governments have done it. Argentina did in 2008. Ireland has indicated it might. The worsening financial crisis may eventually move other countries in that direction.

Surely the US would never do so.

Actually, there is little basis for assuming they would not and factual evidence they would. Here are three good reasons to believe they would:.........."

1 posted on 07/25/2011 6:58:32 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Is this a too-fer one post? Your comment and the IRA article deserve their own thread if there isn’t one already.


2 posted on 07/25/2011 7:06:58 AM PDT by listenhillary (It still increases the debt limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I have noticed that EITC is the original “Cash for Clunkers” program. As mentioned in the article, the typical bastard child (original meaning) payment was between $3,000 and $6,000 or the price of a used car.


3 posted on 07/25/2011 7:06:58 AM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (White Hetero Able Male (WHAM) a.k.a. NOT Holder's people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Reid and Pelosi want tax increases so much?
how about starting with this?

this should be blatantly unconstitutional.
and hiding it as a “refund” is despicible.

worse, millions of ILLEGAL immigrants are getting this,
paid by legal taxpayers.


4 posted on 07/25/2011 7:07:33 AM PDT by Elendur (the hope and change i need: Sarah / Colonel West in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
Is this a too-fer one post? Your comment and the IRA article deserve their own thread if there isn’t one already.

Go for it. I have to take off in a bit.

5 posted on 07/25/2011 7:12:01 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Elendur

We should all send this article to our Congresscritters and local tea party. Am doing this today.


6 posted on 07/25/2011 7:13:48 AM PDT by freespirited (Stupid people are ruining America. --Herman Cain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I have mentioned that exact scenario to my accountant and a financial advisor and was scoffed at. Actually I think I phrased it as the govt deciding to impose a surcharge on anyone who has been “lucky” enough (that’s how Bambi sees wealth) to accumulate any net worth.
Like, they would say, “Hey, send us 4% of your net worth and we’ll be magnanimous and not freeze all of your accounts.”


7 posted on 07/25/2011 7:19:27 AM PDT by GnuHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elendur
Unbelievable and reprehensible.
You know, Pelosi and Reid want tax increases on the very wealthy, who, by the way and according to them, want to be taxed more. Well, if those wealthy idiots want to be taxed more why not just give the government more money - why wait to be taxed - just give it out of the goodness of their hearts. I don't believe for a second they would do that. Just say’in.
8 posted on 07/25/2011 7:21:35 AM PDT by Bitsy (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The ruling class has skillfully clouded the notion of taxes. I have a simple plan:

1. Teach High School Seniors how to fill out a 1040-EZ

2. No more automatic withholding for anything - write a check at the end of the year.

3. Accompany EIC ‘refunds’ with a letter, explaining that it is really a ‘donation’.

No. 1 takes the mystery away, and helps dumb minds understand what taxes are...and prevents them from paying a few hundred bucks at H&R Block, with a refund anticipation loan tacked on.

No. 2 will let people ‘feel it’ alot more. People will really become more aware of what they pay. As a compromise, I would accept writing a monthly check to the government, for each program (IRS, Medicaid, Soc Security, etc.).

No. 3 would educate these morons working the register at the gas station - quit bragging to each other about how big your ‘refund’ is going to be, in front of people like me. Only 56% of people pay taxes...and I swear only 56% of the people in this country are aware of this fact. The other 44% still think they pay taxes...and evil politicians like Pelosi get them riled up - why do the rich get a tax break, when I don’t?


9 posted on 07/25/2011 7:26:54 AM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The GOP does a piss-poor job of getting this kind of info out to the public. When Obozo cries that we need to "raise taxes on the rich to level the playing field", where's the GOP and why aren't they yelling: "The top 10% of income earners pay 66% of total income taxes collected by the federal gov't. If Obozo wants to level the playing field, let's do away with the IRS code and make everyone pay 17% in federal income taxes. How's that for a level playing field?"
10 posted on 07/25/2011 7:27:45 AM PDT by econjack (Some people are dumber than soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lacrew
2. No more automatic withholding for anything - write a check at the end of the year.

Make it October 31st, for several reasons, the main reason being that it would be within 2 weeks of election day.

11 posted on 07/25/2011 7:29:04 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bitsy
Well, if those wealthy idiots want to be taxed more why not just give the government more money - why wait to be taxed - just give it out of the goodness of their hearts.

I use a similar argument from liberals who say "we" need to help the poor. When I ask "Why?", they are appalled. My defense is that I am more than willing to help them learn a skill but I am unwilling to give them cash because they just fritter it away (as this article points out). Most do nothing to solve their economic problems. They simply want me to pay for their existence. I go on to tell them that, if they feel that way, add a few thousand extra dollars to your tax return if it makes you feel better, but don't ask me to chip in on programs I don't believe in.

12 posted on 07/25/2011 7:34:13 AM PDT by econjack (Some people are dumber than soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman
we've had nurses aides who stay UNMARRIED but living with their "significant" other just so they can claim the big money at the end of the year.....

my niece has several children, and her husband works hard, but the kids are all on medicaid....and they get the big check too....it makes me a little mad however when I hear she's running her cat to the vets.......how can you not have enough money for your family yet can afford taking an animal to the vet?....

13 posted on 07/25/2011 7:35:38 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MrB

It is actually worse than he describes. We have it going on in our extended family. Husband and wife..two kids. She works as waitress part time for cash. He works part time in kitchen. She gets SS disability..for minor chronic condition which doesn’t prevent her working. So they make enough to survive without help. They could make more, but she would loose SS if she did work more hours and declare it. This year they “got refund” of $9000.
All the illegals working for cash are doing something similar.


14 posted on 07/25/2011 7:40:30 AM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
A friend of mine owns some rental properties and has a number of low income renters using "rent vouchers". They are on welfare and receive food stamps, clothing vouchers, transportation vouchers, heating vouchers and so on. The stories of abuse and fraud are blood curdling.

Worst of all, they also abuse the local nonprofit food pantries. One renter moved out and left behind an entire bedroom crammed literally full of food pantry items. Other renters have left behind multiple rooms of "voucher clothing" that was worn until it became dirty and then was discarded into a heap.

This really hurts me when I think about how hard I've worked for my income and how careful and frugal my wife and I are as we provide for our family. I'm really tired of carrying the deadwood on my back.

15 posted on 07/25/2011 7:43:32 AM PDT by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; LMAO; DeaconBenjamin; April Lexington; murphE; RipSawyer; Tunehead54; preacher; ..
The Peter Schiff/Austrian Economics ping. (Washington Bankrupting our Nation by Spending your past, present and future money!)

FROM LINK:”We generally knew that 47 percent of our population pays no income taxes whatsoever. However, we didn't know, and I suspect that very few of you know, how much of your tax money is actually given to non-taxpayers — in a lump sum, to do with as they please. Like most anti-poverty programs, the Earned Income Tax Credit when enacted in 1975 was supposed to be temporary. It was visualized as a tool to lift the working poor out of poverty. It was quickly made permanent and has been modified numerous times over the ensuing 36 years. In 2004, 20 million families received $36 billion. The flower children assume that was $36 billion spent on food, shelter, and health care. We who live in the real world know it was spent on big-screen television sets, 22-inch chrome wheels, and colorful tattoos. It was widely noted last week that those living below the poverty level in the U.S. tend to own cars, TVs, computers, cells phones, enjoy air-conditioning, and own video game consoles. The free money these folks receive from you and me is not counted for poverty level calculations. The typical 1040 would show an income of between $12,000 to $18,000 for the year. It was usually accompanied by one W-2 with the income earned almost always by a female. With other refundable credits listed, a “refund” would be claimed of between $6,000 and $9,000.
And these people believe that is their money; they have a right to it. I fielded a telephone query from a woman who didn't even say hello, but blurted, “I haven't got my taxes.”
For an instant I thought she meant that she didn't have enough money to pay her taxes, but I quickly realized she was talking about her “refund.

July 25, 2011 Among the Tax-takers

16 posted on 07/25/2011 7:46:03 AM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry

I have a family member who went to nursing school with a girl who was attending on the taxpayer dime. When she finished school, she decided she wouldn’t sit for her board exams because then the government would expect her to get a job.

The boy worked with a single mom (unmarried but baby daddy on the scene helping suck up bennies) who received a $6000 refund. My first thought was pay the rent and utilities up... she took her little “poverty stricken” family on a cruise.

Getting something for nothing appears to be the NEW American dream.


17 posted on 07/25/2011 7:49:59 AM PDT by nodumbblonde ("The ladder of success is best climbed by stepping on the rungs of opportunity." - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: econjack

I’ve suggested to my libinlaw that if she and her fellow travelers feel so strongly about “helping the needy” that they should start a charity with that goal in mind.

The response was that “people wouldn’t give enough”.

Oh, so if they won’t give voluntarily, it’s OK to just take it, eh?


18 posted on 07/25/2011 7:52:06 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nodumbblonde

Responsible people often have to skip years to save up enough for the occasional modest vacation.

Those on the dole often take several lavish vacations a year.


19 posted on 07/25/2011 7:53:55 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Yeah, but we’re not in favor of tax hikes.


20 posted on 07/25/2011 8:03:29 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson