Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nateman
We sat around with bated breath hoping the latest scandal would be the one that took Slick Willy down.

The problem then was that a lot of people really saw no problem with Bill Clinton's relations with Ms. Lewinski, and thought the Republicans were being nosy busybodies. If Mrs. Clinton was willing to let her husband's affairs slide, what right did the the Republicans have to complain about them?

I really don't think the same issue applies here. There is some danger that the administration will be able to convince people suffering from Liberal Mind Fog Disorder both that they are so incompetent as to not realize that letting firearms disappear untraceably into criminal gangs is going to get people killed, and they they are not so incompetent as to be entrusted with control of the government, but I think even a hardcore liberal would have a hard time arguing that the administration's actions aren't sufficiently suspicious that Republicans are justified in demanding some answers.

14 posted on 07/13/2011 7:06:24 PM PDT by supercat (Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
...thought the Republicans were being nosy busybodies...

If this was a just Universe a picture of Clinton would be in the dictionary under the word "corruption". This man was so low he hid his many crimes behind a blow job! He used new scandals to push old ones off the headlines! I'm convinced he had Vince Foster murdered and sold secrets to the Communist Chinese, but your typical American only thinks it was only about sex with this guy.

16 posted on 07/13/2011 7:15:43 PM PDT by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson