Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Significantly, I can't find any govt document since 1992 from regular Google searches that accurately lists the number of high-paid government "workers" in each department: particularly limited is the number of SES (all 150,000.00 plus salaries BEFORE bonuses!) and GS-13, GS-14, and GS 15 (up to $155,000.00 per year before bonuses.)
1 posted on 07/06/2011 9:56:24 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE

don’t forget to include those golden benefits in their pay package (Cadillac health plans, lifetime pensions, both which ask of little contributions from the employee compared to us regular working schmo’s)...


2 posted on 07/06/2011 9:59:04 AM PDT by God luvs America (63.5million pay no federal income tax then vote demoKrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

How about an immediate 20% wealth tax on all politicians & their immediate families until the budget is balanced?


3 posted on 07/06/2011 10:06:29 AM PDT by Darteaus94025
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE; All

If you guys really believe top level govt civil service workers are fat cats- why didn’t you enter the civil service?

Why stand on the sidelines and cast stones at people who chose a profession you could have chosen?

From where I sit the peopel who work in local city county and state government are better paid and have MUCH better benefits than federals.

I don’t get the envy.

Oh wait, it is ENVY

You know you could fire every fed or take 100% of their pay and it wouldn’t begin to touch the $14 Trillion deficit.


4 posted on 07/06/2011 10:15:18 AM PDT by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Time to change the language in these debates. No more “Tax the Rich.” Time to switch the narrative to “Tax the Employers.” That’s what it really is all about.


7 posted on 07/06/2011 10:36:54 AM PDT by catch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Ah yes, you should sell this to Obama.

It would help him to define the "Rich" much lower and allow him to be far more honest.

Of course that would put a lot of small businesses out of business, but what they heck - we don't need any new jobs as his "stimulus" brought in enough.

Your article seems to encourage Obama to redefine the "Rich" lower to get more revenues, Whoopee. Let's put more folks on the streets.

/Sarcasm OFF Beware- THE TAX MAN COMETH!

8 posted on 07/06/2011 10:44:01 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

LOL, I am a GS, and no one who works with me makes near those numbers. That kind of pay goes to high level people in regional and national offices, not your average working stiff out on the front lines dealing with the public every day. This is like picking on the cashier because the store manager makes a great deal of money. When you paint with too broad a brush it discredits your arguments.


9 posted on 07/06/2011 10:45:16 AM PDT by flying Elvis ("In...War, the errors which proceed from a spirit of benevolence are the worst" Clausewitz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

yeah, and while we’re at it, let’s tax the snot out of the govt contractors as well....after all, they’re just bastard govt workers.
Pay scales are available at http://www.opm.gov/oca/11tables/index.asp
Bonuses are up to the discretion of the individual’s supervisor...cannot exceed 10% of annual pay, though that certainly isn’t typical-many dont get one, and from what I have seen, it is usually in the 1%-2% range, and 33% of that comes out in taxes.
Flat tax rate, that way, everyone has a dog in the fight


13 posted on 07/06/2011 10:55:14 AM PDT by Razwan (Yeah, yeah, I know...Razwan, member since 30 June 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
I think a 10% income tax surtax to be used for deficit elimination should be enacted. It should cover all income so if you get social security, a pension, any income of any kind you are taxed. Until everybody is paying to eliminate the deficit they wont get serious about it...
15 posted on 07/06/2011 11:27:49 AM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson