The investigation revealed that a day after the May incident the Guinean immigrant called a man, in jail for possession of 400 pounds of marijuana, to discuss how she might exploit the case. The call was taped. Even more compelling, this man and others had made cash deposits totaling $100,000 in the maid’s bank account. This raised the possibility that the woman was involved in drug trafficking and money laundering. There’s more, but that’s enough.
So I await evidence.
But let me say this: Why would a woman with, "they" "say", so much to hide --- deportable immigration fraud, money-laundering, etc. --- risk everything for a public fracas that would expose her to certain scrutiny, exposure and prosecution? She had to know she was way too vulnerable to risk being investigated, herself.
Something here does not add up.
Wow.
What sort of power play was going on here?
Not one word of that post is correct, the news account was someone in law enforcement alleged that that was what they discussed in his opinion. Tell him to up the tape.