So I await evidence.
But let me say this: Why would a woman with, "they" "say", so much to hide --- deportable immigration fraud, money-laundering, etc. --- risk everything for a public fracas that would expose her to certain scrutiny, exposure and prosecution? She had to know she was way too vulnerable to risk being investigated, herself.
Something here does not add up.
But let me say this: Why would a woman with, “they” “say”, so much to hide -— deportable immigration fraud, money-laundering, etc. -— risk everything for a public fracas that would expose her to certain scrutiny, exposure and prosecution? She had to know she was way too vulnerable to risk being investigated, herself.
Easy for me to believe. She got over confident after all the scams and whoring she pulled without any repercussions. I remember when this first broke her brother called her a “pious Muslim” what a joke!
Feminists exposed by rush to judgment----- .....According to their too-perfect narrative, his alleged victim, a pious Muslim refugee and single mother, was "traumatized" by a brutal sex attack. ...
I agree. she is being systematically destroyed, maybe with her consent. DSK paid her.
If, as a previous post states, she was stupid enough to call someone in prison for marijuana possession, and NOT know her call would be taped, as she discussed with him how to exploit the “assault”, she’s stupid enough not to see how she and her history would be gone over with a fine tooth comb, and how our legal process works. These people are not very sophisticated after all, to think they were
engineering the ‘perfect shake-down’.
She got the $100,000.00 from the IMF politician as a “shut up” bribe after the assault.
Or, she was paid $100,000.00 as a bribe before the assault to entrap the IMF politician from some other side of his office (think French political opponent, or Socialist opponent, or IMF opponent, person/country who wants to influence the IMF) who would immediately benefit from the IMF head’s troubles.
Thus, she is discussing what do do with the money.
(With this administration - you really think she is going to get in trouble based on her immigration status? H*ll - that’s makes her a double victim in their eyes!)
“Details on both sides are going to continue to ooze out — I notice the NY Post and NY Daily News are now (as of today, July 4) taking opposite sides, each with their own set of unnamed sources and innuendoes.”
Expect the Daily News to side with the maid. It’s a paper marketed towards democrats/blacks/jewish liberals, and in recent years has come under heavy “black influence”.
Expect the New York Post to side with Strauss. Although they are even more “tabloid” than is the News, their editorial page stance is quite conservative.
Just sayin’....