Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

After all, you can only elect the first African-American president once, and the past two and a half years have deeply disappointed many liberals.
I've been saying this for months. The new, and the novelty, of electing America's first Black President has worn off. The Blacks, Hispanics and Liberals are disappointed in President Clueless. The turn-out in 2012 will be nowhere near what it was in 2008.
1 posted on 07/03/2011 10:31:16 PM PDT by no dems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: no dems

if you surf around the liberal blogs and websites, you will see that the hatred of republicans/conservatives is still alive. The theme will be that anything, no matter how bad, is better than any republican.


2 posted on 07/03/2011 10:34:10 PM PDT by Loud Mime (Democrats = Dependence - Debt - Derision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

Its a given that Newsweek is in the AnointedIdiot’s bag....as has long been established. How quaint that the label this article as they do.....=.=


3 posted on 07/03/2011 10:36:46 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

“Rekindling the enthusiasm of African-Americans, educated white liberals, Latinos, young people, and union members—the Democratic Party’s most loyal and progressive members—will be a huge challenge.”

Frankly, these groups are disappointed in Obama - but come November of 2012, they’ll be fully engaged.

The only group that I could envision seeing a drop-off in support is young people. Supporting Obama in ‘08 was the cool thing to do.

The most important group that’s not mentioned is not a natural base of the Democrats. It’s the white suburban independent voter. That includes the “soccer mom” sub-group. If they stay away from Obama and the Dems (like they did in 2010), it will bode well for the GOP.


5 posted on 07/03/2011 10:42:27 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

Promise them more stuff. They believed it the first time.


6 posted on 07/03/2011 10:42:53 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

He can resign.


8 posted on 07/03/2011 10:48:48 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

“About the strongest argument Obama can make to base voters: it could, and will, be a lot worse if you don?t vote for me. That?s true, “.

Really - Newsweek should explain why they think this is true.


9 posted on 07/03/2011 10:49:27 PM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

Blacks, the mainstream media and unions will continue to goosestep behind Obama off a cliff without a second thought, and he will lose a few points with Latinos and Jews, but not much.

I think conservatives have a shot, because they aren’t stupid as liberals, and won’t allow a second term.

I think there was Bush burn out in the last election, and McCain sucked, but there won’t be any complacency this time.

The stakes are too high this time.


10 posted on 07/03/2011 10:50:15 PM PDT by radpolis (Liberals: You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems
You are dead on. This enthusiasm deficit is the kiss of death. There will be no GOP voters being swayed this time and most independents have proven they have little patience for the Regime as demonstrated in every election since Obummer got in. '12 will be blood bath for the Rats and they know it. Just look at how weak Obummers campaign stops have been with the lack of attendees.


11 posted on 07/03/2011 10:52:29 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems
After all, you can only elect the first African-American president once, and the past two and a half years have deeply disappointed many liberals.

I've been saying this for months.

See my tagline. Unchanged since December 2008.

16 posted on 07/03/2011 11:06:09 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

So in the end, all 0bama ends up being is another fear and hate spreading, mud raking two-bit run of the mill Left Wing political hack.

Yeah, he was SOOOOO unique and different...

What Fools the 0bamazombies are.


17 posted on 07/03/2011 11:09:09 PM PDT by R0CK3T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems
"OBAMA'S 2012 GAME PLAN: How can the president rev up and mobilize his demoralized liberal base?"

I could just slap the stupid out of the morons in the media who write such stupid titles.

It starts off with a declarative statement, and then poses a question that begs for an answer to that same declarative statement.

I guess a basic command of the English language is no longer a requirement to be a journalist, or even an editor. Crikey......

That said, there's no way for Obama to "rev up" his demoralized base. Most of his staunchly loyal supporters are in the Gimme Class, or are so politically, educationally, and culturally clueless, as to be beyond redemption.

These are the people who won't even bother to show up at the polls on election day, because The Won is their messiah, and he'll just magically reappear as their president, because everyone is going to vote for him. The Republicans don't stand a chance, because the media told them so, so why bother?

Of those who really are demoralized, many will be too disillusioned to make the effort to give him another vote of confidence. The thrill is gone for them, and unless they take the next year or so truly informing themselves, they're not going to even consider voting for the Republican. They'll just stay home.

Then, there are those who have actually been horrified at what they've done. These folks have real buyer's remorse, because they've had their eyes open for the previous two years, and have witnessed Obama ripping our nation's foundations asunder.

Many of these folks are about to cross the Rubicon, and give the Republican a chance. The more outspoken that Republican challenger is, and the more in opposition to Obama's agenda they are, the more likely these folks are to vote for them.

This is all the more reason that our nominee CANNOT be another milquetoast RINO, maneuvered into position by the ruling class. They have GOT to be a fierce patriot, who's unloading on Obama and the Marxist Dems with both barrels blazing.

The only candidate on our side who has naturally, and consistently met that bar, is Sarah Palin. We must ensure that she is our nominee in 2012. It's for all the marbles this time.

18 posted on 07/03/2011 11:18:02 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems
Likely he will spin into full hypnotist mode again and hope to once again put them under his spell.
31 posted on 07/04/2011 1:15:25 AM PDT by Bellflower (Isa 32:5 The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said [to be] bountiful.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

For the Base, it will never change. The american communist party is openly supporting Obama and no one is blinking an eye.

What is going to trouble Obama is how he gets back the middle. Many of them aren’t working. I don’t think running on continued unemployment is going to fly.


32 posted on 07/04/2011 1:29:00 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Save the planet, destroy the MSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

34 posted on 07/04/2011 2:30:54 AM PDT by Hugin ("A man'll usually tell you his bad intentions if you listen and let yourself hear it"--- Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems
it could, and will, be a lot worse if you don’t vote for me. That’s true...

How is that a TRUE statement, Newsweek?

35 posted on 07/04/2011 3:19:35 AM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

What’s the problem?

They’re all unemployed with nothing better to do.


43 posted on 07/04/2011 5:31:38 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: no dems

“Aabout the strongest argument Obama can make to base voters: it could, and will, be a lot worse if you don’t vote for me. That’s true”

Yeah, that’s the objectivity I expect from Newsweek. I appreciate that they admit he has a weak argument. But to go on to say it’s true that any Republican would be a lot worse just flushes any appearance of fairness.


53 posted on 07/04/2011 10:58:44 PM PDT by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson