Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Clinton Appointed Judges change law voted in by a majority of voters.
1 posted on 07/01/2011 9:48:45 AM PDT by Main Street
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Main Street

So...it’s unconstitutional to NOT discriminate in favor of certain groups???

And...this is where in the Constitution?


2 posted on 07/01/2011 9:52:15 AM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street

Whites only = Jim Crow and Illegal.
Blacks only = Affirmative Action and is sanctioned by our government.

Any questions?


3 posted on 07/01/2011 9:53:39 AM PDT by Tzimisce (Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street

Did they explain how it “burdens minorities”?


4 posted on 07/01/2011 9:53:53 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street

Time to cut off taxpayer funding of colleges and universities. If they have to start paying their own way, the only color they’ll care about is green.


5 posted on 07/01/2011 9:54:01 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street

” Clinton Appointed Judges change law voted in by a majority of voters. “

Wasn’t there a Supreme Court ruling a couple of years ago to the effect that Michigan could eliminate race-based admissions and hiring??

(Or, my leaky old memory might be playing tricks again...)


6 posted on 07/01/2011 9:54:13 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street

The only reason “race” is still an issue in the country is the left KEEPs it an issue. Real Americans judge each other on merit, not skin color.


7 posted on 07/01/2011 9:54:35 AM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street
So let me see if I understand this. Some authoritarians in black robes have ruled that only through government mandated preferential treatment according to race can we achieve the Constitutionally mandated equal protection under the law.

I think Kafka wrote an outline for this story, but then went back to a man turning into a giant bug as more realistic.

8 posted on 07/01/2011 9:55:51 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! Tea Party extremism is a badge of honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street

Liberal judges: never letting that Constitution-thingy get in the way of a good, leftist agenda.


11 posted on 07/01/2011 9:57:48 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street

Another tyrannical Federal judge. Bench the bastard or bitch.


14 posted on 07/01/2011 9:59:26 AM PDT by jimfree (In 2012 Sarah Palin will have more quality executive experience than Barack Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street

Were these the judges people or Holder’s people?


19 posted on 07/01/2011 10:03:21 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street
Clinton Appointed Judges change law voted in by a majority of voters.

The judge is either an idiot or is cynically buying time. Proposition 209 in California did the same and it was upheld by the SCOTUS.

20 posted on 07/01/2011 10:05:03 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street

Racism alive and well. Without these racist programs where would Obuttface, The Moocher, and her rats be?


21 posted on 07/01/2011 10:07:07 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Read "The Grey Book" for an alternative to corruption in DC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street

Seeing as how liberals decry the evils of Institutional Racism, I’m certain they will oppose this decision.


23 posted on 07/01/2011 10:10:26 AM PDT by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street

The U.S. has already been around the block on this. Affirmative action was a well-meaning, ill-conceived program. Conclusion: academic achievement should be the sole criterion for admission and advancement. Make sure the educational system is good from the earliest grades to give all equal opportunity to achieve, but don’t pretend they’ve achieved when they have not.


25 posted on 07/01/2011 10:11:50 AM PDT by Seeing More Clearly Now (From 1963 Congressional Record http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street

Sooo, instead of may the best person win, it is now the law of the land that if you are a shiftless lazy amish lad wearing your pants to your knees and your dreadlocks in place and you put forth little effort to better yourself in high school, you will get extra special bonus admittance to colege, jobs, etc?
Near time for that little revolution yet?
And Sandra Day O’conner says itis wrong to criticiize judges, many ought be in prison or worse.


27 posted on 07/01/2011 10:14:00 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) NO RINOs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street

From the decision:

“Hunter and Seattle thus expounded the rule that an enactment deprives minority groups of equal protection of the laws when it: (1) has a racial focus, targeting a goal or program that “inures primarily to the benefit of the minority”; and (2) works a reallocation of political power or reordering of the decisionmaking process that places “special burdens” on a minority group’s ability to achieve its goals through that process.”

http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/11a0174p-06.pdf

Apparently, any reward of a minority group is legal, and refusing to give special treatment is banned because equal protection is unequal.

Further, any election that results in a minority group losing power is an unconstitutional election.

WOW!

So Obama cannot be removed from office unless the opponent is black, since the election of a white to replace a black would “work a reallocation of political power or reordering of the decisionmaking process that places “special burdens” on a minority group’s ability to achieve its goals through that process.”

Guess Cain is our only hope to defeat Obama, since it would be illegal to frustrate black voters by allowing a white man or woman to replace him.

Alice in Wonderland: equal treatment is illegal because equal protection under the law requires unequal treatment.


28 posted on 07/01/2011 10:14:12 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Poor history is better than good fiction, and anything with lots of horses is better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street

Insanity. We successfully defended such a law in CA.


33 posted on 07/01/2011 10:23:43 AM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street
A friends wife is a doctor ( and a screaming liberal ) who trains any number of residents each year. We had a discussion recently in which she flat out stated she is deeply worried about the level of competence of the black residents. Not all but most of them. She stated they must have been pushed along due to affirmative action and certainly not merit. They are nowhere near qualified to be residents let along doctors.

The students she trains who she believes are the best educated and talented are from Asia and India. Their level of knowledge is far above all the other students.

37 posted on 07/01/2011 10:28:19 AM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street

anyone know how much the voters passed this by?


39 posted on 07/01/2011 10:40:26 AM PDT by MNDude (so that's what they meant by Carter's second term)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Main Street

In Leftyland, “Unequal” is the new “equal”.


40 posted on 07/01/2011 10:46:25 AM PDT by Iron Munro (The more effeminate & debauched the people, the more they are fitted for a tyrannical government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson