[kjo]

So...it’s unconstitutional to NOT discriminate in favor of certain groups???

And...this is where in the Constitution?

[Cheerio]

And...this is where in the Constitution?

I found it right after the right to an abortion at tax payer expense, the right to health car, and the right to a house. /sarc

The RAT party hates the Constitution and the boy king and his thugs are doing everything they can to ignore it. The Judicial branch is being beefed up by the RATS so they have a backstop when the electorate rises up and throws them all out of office on Nov 6, 2012.

[Maelstorm]

Yeah discrimination is fine when you are discriminating in a way that is favorable to liberal goals. It is too bad the constitution doesn’t go further in banning ‘bills of attainder’ and similiar types of special protections for special groups.

[chuckee]

The Bizarro District Court of Appeals. Up is down.The only cure for discrimination is discrimination.

[DaxtonBrown]

[So...it’s unconstitutional to NOT discriminate in favor of certain groups???]

Exactly, the ruling is so idiotic that it can’t be allowed to stand (in a logical world). If it does stand, the Supreme Court would be required to distinguish who the favored minorities are, that would be a pip to read. And could whites be a favored minority (ever?) if they were numerically underrepresented in a given location?

[Elsiejay]

“And...this is where in the Constitution?”

Constitution? What Constitution?

We don’ need no bleepin’ Constitution!!

[KTM rider]

that was my first thought if it favors certain races then it disenfranchises the non-favored races.

the supreme court is racist against white people

[pepsionice]

You basically walk up and declare yourself a native American Indian. In twelve months....99 percent of the state could be of some minority group and then this whole discussion is null and void. The court system would be unable to prove you weren’t native American, and the system would become a joke.