And no, I am not kidding. This is for real.
wow, had no idea, crazy! I always thought it was a personal choice.
No kidding. The democrat party is fiercely anti-semitic these days.
Yet the sheep to the slaughter Jews still bankroll and vote for their oppressors.
And no, I am not kidding. This is for real.
This is stupid and bizarre. What is this guy’s real motivation? For Jews, this is a religious practice. But, I believe (correct me if I’m wrong) isn’t circumcision performed routinely in hospitals on most boy babies shortly after birth? I don’t want to get graphic, but it has to do with male cleanliness and such. It’s a standard practice recommended by doctors, usually unless the parents requests otherwise.
Whatever the reason, health or religion, this is a matter for parents to decide with their baby son’s doctor.
An absurd assertion; only the San Francisco pervert culture could come up with such juvenile ignorant comparisons. AIDS must addle many brains.
Polygamy impacts society in an enormous varieties of ways, not just the "family" involved.
Christian Scientists are a special case, and involves serious complications and even death, and can already be dealt with with existing child protection programs and laws. No such dangers accrue to circumcision.
What ever happened to the pervert worship of "Freedom of Choice?"
Perhaps the perverts can go back and concentrate on pervert racist Nazi comic books and parades.
Circumcision in not any more dangerous than earlobe piercing, and infinitely less dangerous than the piercings of body parts that can't be discussed in a family forum. That San Francisco has the chutzpah to even present this sicko law proposal is mind-boggling.
Shall we discuss food-processing unborn babies?
They’re just begging to be the Big One’s epicenter, aren’t they?
I got into an argument with a lib over this the other day. He said that it was a matter of “human rights” and that parents had no right to choose to “maim” their babies. I then asked him why it was okay for them “choose” to kill a viable baby in the womb, but not “choose” to circumcise that same baby. His response was to get angry and say “Then Republicans can take care of crack babies!” and he left.
The interesting thing is that it is also anti-muslim. In fact this is perhaps the only issue on which the Muslim and Jewish religious leaders can agree!
At least we could hang Streicher...
When do they start talking about making Matzoh from the blood of Progressive babies?
I would laugh in their faces.
First, you are not healing anything here, you're causing a needless injury to a normally formed, functional body part.
Second, "rights to free religious practice" do not extend to third-parties taking knives to a baby on your behalf. These newborns have rights too. A right to be safe and whole, not to be maimed. A right to decide whether to engage in a religious rite that will permanently alter his physical person.
If Mormons or Scientologists branded infants like cattle, the outrage would be deafening, and the resistance to this common sense infant protection would be non-existent.
This should be used as part of a national television campaign against all Democrats. Someone get the paint brush with the broad stroke.
It’s not anti-Semitic, it’s anti-AMERICAN. What we do in our personal lives should have no bearing from the “government” that we finance with OUR money. (Get outta’ here and leave me alone!!!)